??? this isn’t my fight bro lmao

You made this your fight by inserting yourself into the discussion and turning it into an argument.

What whataboutism? If there is no proof, then innocent until proven guilty. You want to believe sexual assaults without proof and we have seen countless times how that turns out.

Are you trolling me? I literally said you have comprehension problems and then you go ahead and use completely different words with different meaning (opinion vs claims with evidence) to accuse me.

This is an ongoing case, the evidence will come with time. If any, which is why I said it looks like a weak case, if you can comprehend what that means.

The original comment stated "alleged SA

Exactly. This means that they’re likely talking about the case, the allegations/accusations. I then commented ON THAT CASE that it looks weak. Anyone who then starts getting personal (you were the first to insult me, which prompted my “listen here you little shit” comment) instead of staying objective implies you truly believe the accusations before trial has happened. That sounds like you. I was also quite clear on my position (that I want altman to lose), but I’m not going to start lying to myself. If new evidence is going to get presented, then obviously it would change how strong the case looks. Are you starting to understand? Please never work as a lawyer.

I think you should go back and read the original comment that started this discussion. You inserted yourself into it and now you think I’m accusing you, not stating my opinion on the topic. Stop with the logical fallacy arguments if you yourself tend to be expert at using them.

maybe it’s your time of the month?

Did you just say I’m just a woman on period?

Listen here you little shit. You do not start yelling “HE’S A RAPIST” before any evidence or court closure. Do you understand the meaning behind “innocent until proven guilty”? I commented on the fucking case, you keep making this into something else. Her lifestyle is part of the case.

Everyone is allowed to comment how strong or weak the case looks, and you can state your opinion too without becoming a fucking redditor with “your opinion is invalid and stupid because it does not match my opinion”

Fuck you.

Is it really easier to insult god than to admit no such thing exists and humans are lawless?

But that’s work

My brother in christ this all started as a sex assault allegation, which is very serious, with me simply stating my opinion that it looks like a weak case. You’re over-analyzing this and turning my simple opinion into something it really isn’t. Now I’m loving Altman?? Take a step back, I’m done here.

Objectivity does not work with the average person. You will trigger people and will get downvoted. I understand what you mean, but… yeah, just don’t

Wait, it can finally count how many letters are in a word?

Again - opinion. You suck at comprehension.

Reddit leadership sucks, yes, but the communities not so much. At least the ones I hang around (specific games, etc.)

Naah, estrella and lays are modern vitamins

I think that was Britney

You know what does even more harm to genuine victims? People who lie about SA to use it as extortion and the ones defending them.

No, social media is quite bad in every way.

The only thing I kind of support are community boards like Lemmy and reddit

Takes entire bottle before going into Valorant

White people

vountry

uwu

And you are a person who should form their own opinion instead asking to be fed. I simply stated my opinion with general reasons. We are talking about an ongoing case with no public evidence, do you understand what you’re asking? Simply gather known things and form your own conclusion, and hope for the best outcome.

EDIT: I forgot this isn’t reddit. People do not like objectivity and everyone loves blind hate without proof of wrongdoing.