Ehhhh it depends. If the strain is really far off from what’s in that year’s vaccine, not really. The closer the relationship, the better the protection. Obviously I’m not saying anybody should skip vaccination but it isn’t that simple
lol if you think McDonalds customers aren’t gonna burn the place down because McDonald’s rounded their change
It’s called publication bias, idiots. Research that has no strong result doesn’t get published
The month old story that was front page news in every sports outlet last month?
Nah, the racism fueled him
This was my immediate guess. Not even obtuse terms, just not wanting kids to stumble on torture porn and snuff films
He’s literally doubled the number that Biden did last year? That’s like the second paragraph
The indictment does mention 2 unnamed people, but it quite clearly states that he “sent [written diary] entries to individuals 1 and 2 that contained information classified up to the TOP SECRET level”. He also allegedly emailed top secret info to the same individuals. That email was later hacked by Iran, who gained access to government info.
It’s fine to criticize this, but if you’re going to claim you read the indictment, at least read it…
“Why do people with advanced degrees in statistics understand stratification and statistical modeling better than i do?! I better make an angry post online about it!!1”
I just tried it with other active politicians (“Pelosi”) and it answered. Granted, it said there were no credible reports
Why would it refuse to say anything if I search for Trump, but answer with another prominent politician who is in office?
Please note that NSFW/NSFL videos must be labeled as such or they will be deleted
Edit: also keep in mind that initial information in these situations can often be inaccurate. Trusted outlets have conflicting reports about whether a suspect has been detained.
Edit 2: the campus has officially stated they release the initial subject. Donald Trump has stated Charlie Kirk is dead.
Remember all those ads about Kamala Harris being soft on crime?
Then remember how Trump won and pardoned a bunch of violent criminals?
This is what companies that actually care about privacy do. People over profits
Edit: actually, I’m not quite that naive, there’s certainly a business motive here. Cut the dead weight before it drags you down. Still, a good move nonetheless
This has happened a couple times in the UK. It’s a lot different than the USA for a few reasons, one being the NHS isn’t gonna waste money on someone who has like a .0001% chance of recovery (and why should they?).
It doesn’t sound like they are saying the are going to block sideloading, just sideloading stuff like Kodi that are often used for illegal streaming