Skunk [any]

🫘🥄🦨💨

  • 0 Posts
  • 90 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 25th, 2026

help-circle



  • These are private organizations and they should be able to make their own rules for their own competitions. Weight, sex, capability or lack thereof, steroids yes or no, and so on

    No! They need to be legislated to give equal chance to everyone. Letting private corporations make their own rules has never will never work.

    Additionally this is a mere distraction from what they are really trying to do, incarcerate trans women in mens prisons. That’s the logical end to “trans women are actually men”.

    The more egregious thing in this ad directly though is the “take health care away from trans women if they can’t afford it themselves”

    It’s a non-government issue really, like abortion,

    I will never understand the insistence on having health-care privatized. Of course it’s a governmental issue. The point of the government is to keep the clashes between working people and the employing people to a minimum. Privatizing healthcare is a huge boon for employers that get to tether workers to their jobs by lording their healthcare over their heads. This doesn’t sit well with the workers and so the government has to step in before things get to a head (see also: Brian Thompson).






  • I assume someone as well versed in logic as you has heard of occam’s razor (jk I think you are a reddit-tier debatelord and am sure you have heard of it and can rattle of a whole bunch of logical fallacies without even being able to give a definition of what an argument is).

    What’s more is that this isn’t a logic debate, you are trying to convince me that I’m wrong and the man saying transphobic shit isn’t actually a transphobe. How do you hope to succeed if you don’t offer anything tangible? Your entire argument is “it could also be a clever ruse to use a dog-whistle to catch some votes without actually saying anything literally wrong” which sounds incredibly implausible to me, so you will have to offer something other than a “nuh-uh” if you hope to change my mind and convince me of this thing that, to me, sounds incredibly far-fetched.


  • You’re insisting you’re assumption has to be right,

    So are you 🙂 Why wouldn’t I keep insisting on this in the face of no evidence to the contrary? I keep repeatedly asking for you to give me anything but you either refuse to or more likely lack it.

    I’ve done is point out that you literally agree with what he said

    Yes if we ignore all of the context of these phrases in the political arena, the baggage they carry and what they are being used to push for in legislation and only focus on the literal meaning in the way I would use them then I agree I guess. But it isn’t even me using them so it already falls flat even by that standard. Do you really not understand that “he is only sieg heiling to secure the klan vote, he obviously isn’t hailing a nazi victory but a dem victory” is a really shit argument when you have nothing (0) to back that up?



  • Why do I have to prove it, when you don’t?

    What do you mean, my assertion that he is blowing the pro-discrimination dogwhistles like “no males in womens sports” and “no taxpayer money for GAS” is well proven by this ad that I shared. Your assertions that

    a. He supports preferred pronouns in schools
    b. he supports hormone blockers for minors
    c. he supports adults having surgery

    aren’t. What have I forgotten to give proof for? I’ll provide it. All I’m asking for is anything to hold on to that this guy isn’t the transphobe he is making himself out to be (supposedly to “trick stupid bigots”).

    And you are spreading propaganda to help that Republican, which helps trump.

    I’m spreading his own fucking ad! He literally delivered and then endorsed the message! I’m spreading what he wants everyone to know about him!



  • Again, if you have anything that demonstrates that he is not planning to take health care away from trans people or have women banned from womens sports if they trans then please do share it! I would love it if he isn’t actually anti-trans, that would be really great news! Why wouldn’t I be happy about that?

    He said something that anyone with basic critical thinking easily can understand, because they know a male who transitions to female is no longer male…

    But they don’t know that he knows that. His platform doesn’t even mention trans people (or queer or LGBT or any of those terms) at all. All there is right now is him repeating what the republicans are saying they want to do to trans people verbatim. Hopefully there is a clarifying statement in the next days, I would love nothing more than to eat crow on this. Because if people have to defend someone so hard after his own ad then it clearly is a shit ad and will get pulled and buried. Why confuse your electorate by saying the exact opposite of what you’re planning to do just to maybe pull like a 0.1% percent advantage…


  • He supports preferred pronouns in schools, he supports hormone blockers for minors, he supports adults having surgery.

    Where are you getting this? I’m not seeing anything about it on his platform. That would be good to hear, but as it stands all I have him saying “I oppose tax-payers paying anyone’s sex changes too” in his latest ad. Right after saying “women should not be in women’s sports if they’re trans” too, which is already plenty transphobic before threatening to take away the healthcare of literally any person that needs a sex change (and lets not pretend that this isn’t a widely used statement to mean all gender affirming care).

    Seriously how is “people can do it but the state won’t pay” fucking “anti-trans”?

    Because it is making gender affirming health care less or in-accessible to trans people that rely on medicare or medicaid. Getting a gender affirming surgery is quite different from getting ice cream and definitely not something someone does “just because they wanna”. It’s incredibly intense surgery, with a whole lot of after-care. And again, let’s not pretend that “sex change” is not widely used code, especially in politics, for all gender affirming care.

    He is obviously courting republican transphobes with this ad. He is capitulating to the fascists on the cultur war they started in an transparently desperate attempt to win over some of them, as if anyone who cares this much for getting a transphobe elected would go for the transphobe-lite when they can have the real deal.

    You’re ripping all context out of this, and trying to decrease Dem turnout, seemingly somehow aware that is a million times worse…

    Should we all just pretend the transphobia isn’t there, keep mum about it, don’t mention it, hush hush? Is that really your suggestion?