

But does it ban AI content?


But does it ban AI content?


Does that mean song lyric websites with ads also violate copyright laws?


The wonderful results so far is BECAUSE we don’t focus on the actual crime. Have you not watched how mainstream media covers Trump for the last 8 years?


It’s the difference between having a destroyed town and letting it be taken over by fascist that will use their power to both destroy the town and remove any opposition, leading to a situation where you have no power to even fix the town for decades into the future.


By spreading the word about the boycott.


Why should I address something I’m not trying to deny? You’re the one not addressing what I’ve been asking. Bro, get your head together.


Yeah, but that’s not the part I’m asking about. You’re basically ignoring my question and attempting to force the conversation in a direction you’re more comfortable with. I’m more curious about the ones that is not being covered by the media. You seem to have a problem with them not being covered, yet you avoid sharing any info about them when people are trying to find out. What’s with the irregularity in your stance?


Why are you changing the subject? You said there were more effective protesters that are not being covered. Can you link them for me?


It does when you’re acting like you know better than the protesters, yet have done nothing that is actually better. Actually, you have not even proven that you’ve done anything even on par with them.
Everyone know keyboard warriors have a point, yet everyone also know they are keyboard warrior because they lack the courage to do what they expect others to do. In that sense, you are just a hypocrite unless you prove yourself to not be one. Your use of specific terms to explain things don’t change the fact that nobody listens to people who tell others to do things they are not willing to do themselves. Talk is cheap, even if it’s based on the truth.


Who are these people? Got any links?
If they do exist, I think you’ll find it more effective to spread the word about them instead of trying to pull down other people. You won’t find acceptance amongst the general public if all they see you do is pull down others. Be more effective in your own messaging.


Again, what have YOU done?
I never defended these protests. I only told you how to make your point actually stick, which is by showing what you did personally that was more effective than what they did. It’s you who failed such a simple task and made yourself look like a completely useless keyboard warrior.


Not saying they couldn’t do better, but they are for sure doing more than the guy not doing anything other than criticise the way of people protest on the internet.


Those are people, not you. What did you do that gives you the right to say what other people do are useless? What did YOU do that was more effective.
Doesn’t matter how effective other’s actions are, because they are in a far better position than people who do nothing but criticises other people’s actions.


You keep saying about what they shouldn’t do, yet you have not listed even one thing you’ve already done that is better than things you’re calling as performative. If you want to prove your point, just list these things and explain how they’re more effective than protesting.
From the article, it doesn’t look like these websites should be legal. Musixmatch also doesn’t fall under fair use, I would think.