@jordanlund@lemmy.world just removed my post from !politics@lemmy.world because the linked article wasn’t a “news” source.
The sidebar makes no mention of accepted news sources. And honestly, fuck that fascist nonsense. How the fuck can it be justified to remove posts from articles made by fucking non-profits?
I guess @jordanlund@lemmy.world is also saying that since they disagree with the premise of the article, it should be removed.
People need to be aware that !politics@lemmy.world should be avoided.
This is why I also posted the same thing to !usa@midwest.social
Trump is openly committing treason. He must be impeached and removed from office.
Your post is not a link to an article.
But also jl is still allowed to moderate there, which caught my eye much worse and is more disturbing. I guess fair removal but also wtf they still have Lund? Is there an esh option?
I don’t know who or what jl or lund or esh are, in afraid.
Jl and Lund refer to the chief mod of .world, which needs to be defederated.
Esh refers to a term from a subreddit, ‘everyone sucks here’
Thanks for explaining.
What is an article? Is it something like this definition?
Why can’t an argument written by a non-profit be an article?
If it has to come from a news corporation, which ones? Who gets to decide?
If the MAGA regime decides to label a news source as “fake” is it no longer trusted? What if the news corp is dissolved but the writers started something else?
There’s no sense trying to argue your case like I’m some kind of legal judge. It looked to me like you wrote a sentence of opinion and linked to a petition rather than link to an article. I assumed they meant news article. You didn’t. The person who gets to decide is the moderator.