In a little-noticed Supreme Court case, the country’s largest private prison operator argues companies should be shielded from lawsuits when doing the government’s dirty work.
The principle of what you identified … is mindblowing.
Criminal law, civil/common law, civil-rights, everything, all blanket “no longer applies” to the actual-enacters of anything.
Anybody standing on their hind-legs, in court, claiming any such thing, should probably be deemed guilty-of-treason against constitutional-rights, against civil-rights, against rule-of-Just-law, … holey moley, they’re going far.
& when that is combined with gov’t’s rejection-of-accountability & rejection-of-responsibility, it’s … outright exemption-from-all-civil-rights-regimes, fundamentally…
This isn’t “slippery slope”, this is “coffin-nails being hammered home” territory.
The principle of what you identified … is mindblowing.
Criminal law, civil/common law, civil-rights, everything, all blanket “no longer applies” to the actual-enacters of anything.
Anybody standing on their hind-legs, in court, claiming any such thing, should probably be deemed guilty-of-treason against constitutional-rights, against civil-rights, against rule-of-Just-law, … holey moley, they’re going far.
& when that is combined with gov’t’s rejection-of-accountability & rejection-of-responsibility, it’s … outright exemption-from-all-civil-rights-regimes, fundamentally…
This isn’t “slippery slope”, this is “coffin-nails being hammered home” territory.
_ /\ _