LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Autism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoNeurodiverse problemspiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square111linkfedilinkarrow-up1887arrow-down110
arrow-up1877arrow-down1imageNeurodiverse problemspiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Autism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square111linkfedilink
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months ago Your argument here is the good’ol “but you get what they’re trying to say here?” You and test don’t exist in a vacuum: you can conjure context from your knowledge about the world.
minus-squareokamiueru@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoNot denying that. Do you think that is the argument here?
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoPoint is - the question from test is good enough.
minus-squareokamiueru@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoIf you only want answers from the type of people who can conjure this information, and do so in the same way, sure. What a weird thing to assume about the people answering the question, huh?
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoI mean, additional questions and struggle from the respondent are valuable insight by itself in this context.
You and test don’t exist in a vacuum: you can conjure context from your knowledge about the world.
Not denying that. Do you think that is the argument here?
Point is - the question from test is good enough.
If you only want answers from the type of people who can conjure this information, and do so in the same way, sure. What a weird thing to assume about the people answering the question, huh?
I mean, additional questions and struggle from the respondent are valuable insight by itself in this context.