majestic guy@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoI guessedlemmy.worldimagemessage-square157linkfedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down154
arrow-up1961arrow-down1imageI guessedlemmy.worldmajestic guy@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square157linkfedilink
minus-squareJcbAzPx@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·2 months agoJust replying in kind.
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months ago“In kind” wtf are you talking about? “In kind” would be refuting my arguments logically. The problem being that your position completely fell apart, so you can’t.
minus-squareJcbAzPx@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agoIn kind in this context means I’m giving the same level of responses. Obviously, logic would be far outside that level.
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoWell, you certainly haven’t used an ounce of it this conversation.
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months ago“If vegans care so much about reducing harm to animals, why don’t they extend that to plants? This proves they’re hypocrites.” “But vegans do reduce harm to plants.” “Uhh uhh uhh but if you used logic somehow it still shows uhh you’re dumb” Ok dude.
minus-squareJcbAzPx@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agoThat’s some nice strawman you pulled out of your ass. You should think about doing birthday parties.
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoIf that’s not your position, I legitimately have no idea what it was, because you keep refusing to tell me in favor of these snipes. The reality is that it was your position, it got completely destroyed, and you’re really, really bad at taking an L. Keep posting cope, because it’s clearly all you know how to do.
minus-squareJcbAzPx@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agoIt’s always so sad watching someone that thinks they’re so smart fall on their face.
Just replying in kind.
“In kind” wtf are you talking about? “In kind” would be refuting my arguments logically. The problem being that your position completely fell apart, so you can’t.
In kind in this context means I’m giving the same level of responses. Obviously, logic would be far outside that level.
Well, you certainly haven’t used an ounce of it this conversation.
Likewise.
“If vegans care so much about reducing harm to animals, why don’t they extend that to plants? This proves they’re hypocrites.”
“But vegans do reduce harm to plants.”
“Uhh uhh uhh but if you used logic somehow it still shows uhh you’re dumb”
Ok dude.
That’s some nice strawman you pulled out of your ass. You should think about doing birthday parties.
If that’s not your position, I legitimately have no idea what it was, because you keep refusing to tell me in favor of these snipes.
The reality is that it was your position, it got completely destroyed, and you’re really, really bad at taking an L.
Keep posting cope, because it’s clearly all you know how to do.
It’s always so sad watching someone that thinks they’re so smart fall on their face.