Please don’t downvote posts in this comm because you think a ban was justified. That defeats the purpose of this comm.

  • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Agreed, in general actually, not just for this comm. But it’s impossible to enforce, it’s too difficult for most humans to upvote/downvote only to promote relevancy and quality, rather than agreement. I don’t see any solution for this in a public internet forum.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I worked for a website with up- and down-votes before reddit ever existed. Let me tell you that, no matter what you do or say, the downvote button will always be a disagree button.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I only downvote comments in this community reciprocally when the person has downvoted my comments.

        But… the meta for the posts appears to have emerged:

        • PTB : Upvote
        • YDI : Downvote

        And the totals:

        • Overwhelmingly positive upvotes - Lemmy thinks this was a PTB
        • Balanced - You probably deserved it
        • Overwhelmingly negative upvotes - You deserved more.
  • Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I see a few people who don’t really dare comment on this community are currently on my profile mass downvoting.

    Greetings to Russia! Enjoying your autocratic shithole?

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        As soon as someone proves even one of them wrong, I will.

        But pointing out painfully obvious spam as spam isn’t “leaping to conclusions” any more than 1+1=2 and no matter how many bots people get to spam "you can’t be sure 1+1 is two!!! ", it won’t be.