cantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoSony, Warner sue Anthropic, alleging "blatant theft" of intellectual propertywww.axios.comexternal-linkmessage-square52linkfedilinkarrow-up1496arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1491arrow-down1external-linkSony, Warner sue Anthropic, alleging "blatant theft" of intellectual propertywww.axios.comcantankerous_cashew@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square52linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareredditStinksSuperBad@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down1·2 months agoUh AI steals everyone’s work. How it’s legal I’ll never know.
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·2 months agobecause it was ruled to be a transformative work, like how someone making a video essay on a book/game/movie is (sometimes) not violating copyright.
minus-squareantimidas@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·2 months agoIf AI continues to be treated as transformative work, there should also be a valid case to kill licensing requirements for sampling music. After all, there you’re literally using small clips of someone’s music or similar to make undeniably new art.
minus-squareNuanceDemon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 months agoTo be fair, that should have happened a long time ago. Copyright law hasn’t been fit for purpose for a long time.
minus-squareredditStinksSuperBad@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·2 months agoI saw this ruling and fully disagree.
minus-squareblockheadjt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoSo if I modify someone else’s art and call it my own, the courts will respect this precedent and let me go?
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoif you have enough lawyers and the art ia substantially different (different inteded use) they might
minus-square7101334@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agoYou got downvoted but this is just true lol (Fuck AI slop though)
Uh AI steals everyone’s work. How it’s legal I’ll never know.
because it was ruled to be a transformative work, like how someone making a video essay on a book/game/movie is (sometimes) not violating copyright.
If AI continues to be treated as transformative work, there should also be a valid case to kill licensing requirements for sampling music. After all, there you’re literally using small clips of someone’s music or similar to make undeniably new art.
To be fair, that should have happened a long time ago. Copyright law hasn’t been fit for purpose for a long time.
I saw this ruling and fully disagree.
So if I modify someone else’s art and call it my own, the courts will respect this precedent and let me go?
if you have enough lawyers and the art ia substantially different (different inteded use) they might
You got downvoted but this is just true lol
(Fuck AI slop though)