While obviously great news, can the SC please pick a lane and stick to it with the precedence that they themselves create? For all the various (obvious illegal but who knows) firings there seems to be a completely different decision. No he can’t fire you so you’re safe (for now), no he can’t fire you but we’re gonna allow it anyways (for now), no he can’t fire you but it happened so oopsie poopsie. I know Thomas said they don’t care about precedent any more, but at least be a little consistent with your day to day rulings. It’s utter chaos and I can’t believe how stressful this must be for the lower court judges that are trying to actually maintain law in this country.