A few days ago, Davuluri shared his excitement about it on his official X handle. He seemed very eager to reveal what the company has in mind at the upcoming Ignite event regarding the agentic OS plans.

Unfortunately for Microsoft and Davuluri, the response has been overwhelmingly negative, so much so that the comments on that X post have now been disabled.

Made me laugh. :)

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Funny thing is that is not likely. The shareholders of microsoft (and most blue chip companies) have not really asked for anything other then endless profits lately. This endless drive into shit seems to be almost entirely driven by weird sales pitches and executives chasing a sunk cost.

        • Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          The general idea is that whoever left behind in AI tech will vanish or lose power the next decade. Like Yahoo and other companies during the 2010+. So Google, Meta, Amazon and Microsoft compete now and they don’t care about users. Their focus is enterprise market and the future domination.

          Shareholders of Microsoft push AI.

          Competitor Shareholders push AI.

          Shareholders of hardware push AI.

          Enterprise pushes AI.

        • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s just a longer way to say, yes, the shareholders asked for it.

          Just because they didn’t ask it in letter form or explicitely that doesn’t mean much.

          Look, if M$ does this ‘agentic’ move and its shares drop 20% overnight, then, and only THEN, you’d be right to say the shareholders did not ask for it.

          Are shareholders punishing or rewarding these moves?

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            No, no they did not. They just said nothing, and execs took that to mean what ever they want. As is tradition.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I did, and just think its bullshit. Investors have to invest, where would they put it if not in “safe” companies like microsoft?

                Its total shit talk to put words and intent into a group of people and funds. They don’t care, they just have money to park and Microsoft is seen as a safe place with a good return. There has been too much invested in this shit for them to change course, but also no alternative to invest in.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ha, like 5% of the time. Most of the time its cluster fuck after cluster fuck and visits from the good idea fairies.

            Not saying there should not be innovation, but innovation for nothing but to be able to say you are doing innovation is a cancer.

            • frongt@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yes, that’s why I wrote “innovation” and not innovation. I’m not sure if there’s something that better communicates the Dr. Evil air quotes.