Context: PugJesus often spams low quality posts across the dozen or so communities they mod, apparently downvoting low effort spam on my frontpage is trolling. The only other action in the modlog is a different ban for 74 years for “Mass downvoting innocuous content,” so it definitely seems they are just banning people that dislike their spam. Glad we’re not missing out on the reddit mod experience here.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    so, it is forbidden? i’m not thinking of a particular user btw, although the one mentioned by op is quite power trippy, yea.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t see any specific rules for the grimdank community, but piefed.social does have this instance rule:

      2. Spam and Malicious Behavior

      • No spamming, flooding, or advertising without permission.
      • No scams, phishing attempts, or distribution of malware.
      • No brigading, vote manipulation, or coordinated harassment.

      I could see a case for arguing it’s vote manipulation, although I feel that’s kind of a reach. I just find it weird to get annoyed that someone is posting too much in a shitpost meme sub. Browsing the All feed and getting annoyed with that feels akin to going to a club and being annoyed there’s loud music. Just block the poster bothering you and move on.

    • InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s not forbidden, but also don’t act surprised when whoever you’re downvoting excludes you from their community, which shouldn’t be a big loss to begin with.

        • Skavau@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Not really. Hypothetical: If someone who doesn’t like metal music enters !metal@lemmy.world and downvotes every post there - and commits themselves to doing it to every new post, this hurts their visibility across the Fediverse. Would you not say its reasonable, in this specific hypothetical, for the community owner to ban a user who does that?

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            that’s true but that’s a very specific hypothetical i’m not sure happens that much.

            • Skavau@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Well I’ll give you my own experience: When I was growing !television@lemm.ee before lemm.ee shut down, the community collected about 5 frequent downvoters. None of these accounts ever upvoted. They never participated by posting or commenting. In a few cases, two of the accounts had no posting history on the fediverse at all. They existed purely to downvote. Whether because they didn’t like television as a topic, or hated news articles being posted - I don’t know. But they would, between them, always downvote posts and sometimes do so early - deprecating their visibility.

              Since moving to piefed after lemm.ee shut down, I’ve only had to do it again twice.

              I think it’s reasonable for a community moderator to decide that these accounts are unwelcome and ban them.

              • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                you are right, i don’t think that’s op’s case though. do you think these accounts you describe might be just bots instead?

                • Skavau@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Some of them did interact on the fediverse (although not on television). The ones with no posting/comment activity? No idea.

                  The point is that people really do behave like this.