I have to police the entire thread for any kind of ableism, including comments made after I made that comment and not in response to me, and I have to spend my limited energy to call out every single person I see, otherwise I’m faking caring? Do I understand your point correctly?
Ban them for blatant ableism, too. The trolling was already ableist (deliberately communicating in a way intended to cause confusion, disproportionately affecting ND users but of course also incredibly shitty to NT users), but the comment you’re replying to made it blatant.
No. You don’t seem very bright, so I’m not surprised you don’t understand I’m treating you with the seriousness you deserve.
Not content with deliberately communicating in a confusing and hostile manner and refusing to clarify or stop when asked, you’ve now progressed to overt ableism in using “not very bright” as an insult and implying someone not understanding your deliberately incomprehensible method of communication is “not very bright”.
I believe I don’t know why you even bothered to participate in this discussion if this was what you were going to do.
Are you sure you know what a discussion is?
What do you think I’m trying to say?
I have no idea because you chose to be vague instead of making specific claims about which country and leader China supported. Please stop making every sentence a rhetorical question, just say what you mean directly. Regardless, as I said, it’s not relevant. See the quoted paragraph below from my previous reply.
is your stance that someone who says “this specific claim about China is not supported by credible evidence” has to then answer for every single thing any leader in any country ever supported in any way by China has said?
What would you think of someone who said there was no evidence of a genocide or ethnic cleansing in Gaza?
Yes, you’re correct that if there was an overwhelming amount of credible evidence from an almost uncountable number of sources (including the people committing genocide bragging about it) it would be different.
There’s no equivalence there. Treating these two things as equivalent minimizes (possibly even rises to the level of denying) the actual genocide.
What would you think of someone who regularly defended a country that supports foreign leaders who regularly quote fascist Hitler and Mussolini supporting intellectuals?
Even if we accept whatever you’re trying to say here completely at face value, is your stance that someone who says “this specific claim about China is not supported by credible evidence” has to then answer for every single thing any leader in any country ever supported in any way by China has said?
PTB IMO.
Banned for “genocide denial” for pointing out that even NATOpedia admits that the evidence for the genocide an enemy of NATO is accused of is not credible. What do you have to do to avoid being banned? Be more of an Amerikkkan imperialist than the average Wikipedia editor?
https://lemmy.ml/post/41654379/23321470
Here’s a link to my reply to you from 30 minutes ago which addresses every point you bring up here. I’ll copy the relevant parts below.
I notice you prefered to avoid answering my question about foreign leaders who regularly quote fascist intellectuals, intellectuals who openly admired Hitler and Mussolini.
Why do you think it is that you’d rather not answer a question about leaders who regularly quote fascist intellectuals and the countries that support them?
What would you think if someone tried to change the topic when you asked them a question related to polticians quoting fascist intellectuals?
Even if we accept whatever you’re trying to say here completely at face value, is your stance that someone who says “this specific claim about China is not supported by credible evidence” has to then answer for every single thing any leader in any country ever supported in any way by China has said?
Instead you brought up the double genocide, which wasn’t relevant to my question.
What would you think of someone who said there was no evidence of a genocide or ethnic cleansing in Gaza?
Yes, you’re correct that if there was an overwhelming amount of credible evidence from an almost uncountable number of sources (including the people committing genocide bragging about it) it would be different.
There’s no equivalence there. Treating these two things as equivalent minimizes (possibly even rises to the level of denying) the actual genocide.
Eh, I thought I was cross posting
FYI, on Lemmy you can (unlike some websites) edit your post to change the link or remove the link and include all the information in the post body.
What would you think of someone who said there was no evidence of a genocide or ethnic cleansing in Gaza?
Yes, you’re correct that if there was an overwhelming amount of credible evidence from an almost uncountable number of sources (including the people committing genocide bragging about it) it would be different.
There’s no equivalence there. Treating these two things as equivalent minimizes (possibly even rises to the level of denying) the actual genocide.
What would you think of someone who regularly defended a country that supports foreign leaders who regularly quote fascist Hitler and Mussolini supporting intellectuals?
Even if we accept whatever you’re trying to say here completely at face value, is your stance that someone who says “this specific claim about China is not supported by credible evidence” has to then answer for every single thing any leader in any country ever supported in any way by China has said?
Please actually address my questions if you’re going to reply. Am I expected to personally police all ableism in the thread even if it’s after I stop participating or not in response to me to be taken seriously when I call out ableism?
Since we’re on a dbzer0 comm, shouldn’t you be asking the dbzer0 admins who moderate it about this?