• 0 Posts
  • 39 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 6th, 2026

help-circle






  • MrOtingocni@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.worldI... guess?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    That’s not the face I’d make.

    It would be a face of mild amusement and care as I pulled her into my arms to tell her:

    “Yes, baby, I’d love you even if you were a doorknob. You’d be the most beautiful doorknob in the world to me. I’d even have to hire a butler to open all the doors in front of me because you would be the only doorknob I’d ever want to hold in my hand.”

    Because at the end of the day, coming home to reassure the person you love is a simple and gracious act and is worth every hour of any 14 hour shift.




  • No, I won’t.

    Fuck your “reason”, people covet their own logical prowess but in reality they didn’t come to their views on their own nor their way of seeing things on their own. In fact, it’s a weakness borrowed from others, based on flawed methodology and is what got you into the situation you’re in now.

    I ain’t teaching a class, believe me or don’t, I dgaf.

    99% of people are mostly interested in confirming their own myopic view, to the degree that they will commit violence to ensure it. If someone reaches out a hand, I will grab it, but that’s exceedingly rare and it’s not my day job to fish randos out of their own ignorance un-asked.



  • I don’t know shit about mathematics, except that when numbers and letters collude, that’s a fucking conspiracy against me. That said, I strongly suspect that for legit mathematicians, solving thorny math problems is only half of what they do, but rather, by operating from a platform of experience, intuit the nature of numerical systems, what that means in relation to other systems, and how we use them to understand and navigate the world.

    The title sounds as ridiculous as proclaiming professors of literature are worried because an LLM can parse a sentence.

    There’s a fundamental knowledge, both in the specifics of systems and holistically that can only be gained by solving these quandaries through the lens of human interpretation.







  • This is only the tip of the iceberg.

    In a few years all pics, movies, music, books, news, anything and anyone you don’t see in person will be completely indistinguishable from AI. And most of it will be.

    You won’t even know if the Senator’s face on your tv screen belongs to a real person.

    The new front on the “war” for/on your minds will open. A culmination of all physical, informational, cultural, economic, narrative, and digital reality control systems will converge.

    Even more so than now, people will have no choice but to embrace whatever schema of reality they can access because there will be no way to discern real truth from the manufactured.

    Paranoia will eventually give way to a rather natural “double think” envisioned by Orwell. Tropey but nevertheless prophetic.