It’s like Lemmy but with consolidated comments, flairs, spoilers, polls, topics, feeds (like multireddits), proper blocks, hashtags, piped video integration, disclaimer messages, better mod and reporting tools.

https://join.piefed.social/features/

The Republican party replaced the Whig party and the Bull Moose party came close.

Starting a third party in a FPTP system? That’s just suicide.

It worked in Canada, India and the UK.

That’s one possible interpretation but the modlog doesn’t explicitly state this.

The modlog doesn’t have to state it for it to be the case. Intentions can be masked.

Did you make any posts on Beehaw between the above conversation and the banning? Maybe they still considered your reduced rate of posts too high. If not, then I agree that would be very weird.

I barely made any posts due to the earlier conversation.

Either way, I think this is a good argument to have an explicit rule regarding what constitutes “too much” rather than relying on common sense which is highly subjective.

I agree with that. However a remote poster posting outside their instance should not warrant a ban on their instance for this.

This is why first-past-the-post needs to be replaced with the single transferable vote. The rules were originally designed by the rich for the rich.

Make a third party that appeals regionally at first than expand nationwide to replace the democrats.

However the ban came out of nowhere for posting outside their instance.

was not posting on their instance communities much recently after I promised to pause.

I was frequently posting us news on !usa@midwest.social instead of !usnews@beehaw.org and yet I was still banned.

Why ban someone who complied with the admin’s comment.

The worry is that this could become permanent because I like posting articles I find interesting. Thanks for asking me to clarify.

The instance banning of someone for being active outside their instance communities is not okay when I followed the callout.

It’s okay to want less posts per day on their instance but it’s not okay to instance ban someone for being active outside their communities.

Here’s a third thank you!

PTB! The moderator of !climate@slrpnk.net also has a history of power-tripping.

YDI, you should not have engaged in whatbousim, cherrypicking and then downplaying what the atrocities the uyghurs were facing.