He used to be moderated at least somewhat by concern for his legacy. I think that the abortion ruling ended that. He knows that that ruling is going to be talked about in a similar manner to Dredd Scott and that it alone would nullify anything that could be argued as a restained and responsible exercise of judicial power. When you sign on to a partisan ruling that strips fundamental rights you give up on legacy. Now that that’s not a concern anymore what he’s protecting is his position in the conservative movement. He wants to make sure he stays in a position of power when the Nazis take over.
For a long time I thought that a rotary phone was one of those old wall mounted phones with the horn that you had to crank to make a call because all of those “things people born after 19XX don’t recognize” lists had rotary phones on them. I was born after 19XX and basically everyone I knew had one of these so it couldn’t be a rotary phone.
Yeah, number one was Zack Morris’s phone. I think that the first mobile phone that I had was close to four. It definitely had the extendable antenna and was a flip phone but not a true flip phone like 5.
100% was privately owned. It was owned by the monarch.
Philosophical communism, most famously described by Marx, is a utopian state where government has withered from lack of need as society evolves from capitalism to socialism to communism. That of course has never existed.
What most people mean when when they say communism is a corruption of the idea that has been used by Lenin, Mao, and others to create governments that they claimed would lead to communist utopias. Even that corrupted version requires that the proletariat, the people who sell their labor, become all of the people and be empowered as equals. It requires, at least rhetorically, that the government be subservient to the people and that the people equally control the means of production. Did any of the governments that we identify as communist ever live up to that? No state has ever actually claimed to have achieved communism, (e) in fact most haven’t even claimed to have achieved socialism. The USSR considered itself to be the most socially advanced state post 1961 and called itself a developed socialist state.
Under the European system of monarchies the king owned all land in the kingdom. On that legacy King Charles III and the pope are still the two largest landowners in the world. Were the British Empire and the Roman Empire communist?
E: The US federal government owns about 27% of the land in the US including the majority of Washington DC. State governments own about another 7% and local governments another 2%. That’s more than a third of the country. What’s the tipping point? How far are we from becoming communist based on land ownership?
Who would throw it away? Most likely the states, possibly the military, and least likely but possible, a popular movement of the people.
In the event of the collapse of the federal government the states still have their individual governments. It’d be painful everywhere and especially painful in most red states but we wouldn’t necessarily have a total political collapse.
I do agree that it’s extremely unlikely to happen.