

No it wouldn’t be proportionate.
They should fuckind seize the equipment, expell all the deciders involved on site, and ban all senior managers of that company from entering the country again.


No it wouldn’t be proportionate.
They should fuckind seize the equipment, expell all the deciders involved on site, and ban all senior managers of that company from entering the country again.
Yes, we definitely needed a billionaire’s defender here, because we don’t see enough of their point of view in all the medias they bought.
“Strictly follow the law. We’re all equal. And trust that we spent literally millions to write them so that we’d make them completely fair and not ridiculously imbalanced in our favor!”
They use their money to change the law for their benefit.
So they should not be surprised if people reject these laws when it comes to dealing with them.
Go ahead and lock them up. We’re all watching.
They are not a racial, religious or cultural minority. They can absolutely change their “group” anytime they wish.
They are people who continuously decide to harm others for their own benefit, and at their stage, the only benefit they can imagine is hoarding more and more wealth and use it to get more and more power.
And power they have, and they use against the rest of people.
No one became fascist by dehumanizing the fascists.
Do billionaires ever get punished for crimes? Apart from Jeffrey Epstein, the billionaire who managed a chidren raping ring apparently consisting of only 3 people: himself, his partner, and Prince Andrew, and no one else, based on current investigations and due process…
Wilhoit’s law:
Conservatism consists of only one proposition:
“There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does lot bind alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”
People shoulosd never come down to such threats, say the guys who totally ignore non-violent opposition.
Is it not what anarchy is really about? Low-level self organization.


That’s crazy talking! We have other solutions: banning polls, cheating polls, outright faking polls. There is no alternative here!
Besides, at this stage, if he was to ask what he could do to make things right, he would get a range of answers from “resign” to “kill yourself in the most painful way you can”.


Microphones in the hotel? No need, you carry them in your pocket almost 24/24. There are some in your car. Even if you don’t have a smartphone, a nice combo of PervGlasses and surrounding phones will be sufficient to get what you’re venting about, so that law enforcement can protect the society from your darkest jokes…
And by the time this is implemented, piece by piece, the very same people claiming it’s acceptable/a good thing will totally agree with the processing: you should mind what you say around people, or alone.


Joke aside, every time there were actual review of laws pushed to protect [insert whatever potential victim] from [insert whatever potential threat] at the cost of losing a tiiiiiny bit of freedom, the conclusion is always dire for the said bill/law/mechanism. All countries.
It is never ever about protecting the people.


You can joke about everything, but not with everyone.
She was venting to her boyfriend. It was never meant to become public, or shared in a group, or anyone but her boyfriend, who, lets be bold and assume, knows her enough to assess if she’s really joking or she’s having a nervous breakdown.
So yes: the one and only issue here, is a Snapchat conversation is never a 1:1 conversation, nor are Instagram, Whatsapp, FB Messenger and what not discussions.
Putting the blame on her is normalizing global surveillance.


Tells you a lot about success and merit. He has absolutely no fucking clue what’s going to be successful and what won’t. He was just super lucky with Facebook.
The reason he’s a billionaire is because the system is totally fucked up. He’s a bug, not a feature.
Well you can ask them right now why they support a children rapist.
That’s the “funny” part about assholes dictators: their close circle will still praise them after their death, because they want to maintain the system and the cult for their own benefit, and because they don’t know who will take the dead’s place, and that person could remember what they say about dead people and assume they’ll do it again…
A comedy but showing well the process: the movie “The death of Staline”.
I hope your aim is good. That’s a tiny target!


The EU is a complex organization with different power poles and a variety of different interests. Add to that members of parliament do not always understand everything they vote for. And yes: you get bad things, nonsensical rules, but also good things.
Overall, I would say it’s positive, but when it’s bad it can be brutal.
Edit: I forgot to mention lobbying! Brussels is full of lobbyists!
Yeah, I suspect Trump will cave to the manosphere fans and block their extraditon.
Remember he doesn’t understand allied countries. They’re all either “very bad” or vassal states. Do you think he would have any respect for UK’s extradition demand? Pleasing a few idiots voicing up on Fox News or Newsmax will come first.
Plus he has a personal intererst in minimizing sex crimes involving kids…
If Greenland doesn’t have swarms of cheap drones, Trump won’t need missiles. He will go to ground invasion directly.