Caveman

Sounds like someone is trying to avoid regulating social media platforms.

How about “User must be subscribed to see an activity” so the algo doesn’t just roll you into a rabbit hole.

Subscriptions can still recommend other subscriptions and people can share stuff from their subscriptions but liking something shouldn’t qualify.

That’s an apples to oranges comparison. One is physical health and other mental health and both are hard to quantify

They’re literally boycotting when they finally got an artist from the US

Yeah, it’s very sad since I think people are more willing to vote Labour if they were just better. Now their voter base is more likely to stay at home instead of going to the voting booth. Weird move by Starmer since he was in the march against the Iraq war himself.

Socks are oppression from society.

Because protests give him the ick?

Besides, Republicans do this shit every time Dems are passing a spending bill.

Nah mate, the bill needs 60 votes to pass the Senate

Vespasian was a pretty cool dude. What you’re looking at used to be Nero’s fun place or whatever. Trick is to have tons of money like Microsoft

Shocked pikachu

They’ve been preparing for decades and they literally have now a mobile bridge to make an instant port.

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/03/25/china/china-landing-barges-cable-cutter-taiwan-intl-hnk/index.html

They’ve also been simulating US carrier movement with rails in the desert to be able to shoot it down with missiles.

Made tons of transport ships for military equipment.

It looks like they’re gearing up to take Taiwan so fast that nobody can respond in time.

Conservative / Liberal divide was aimed at the fiscal side of things. Fiscally Conservative being less about spending and focus more on the national debt and liberal being more take a loan and invest the money.

Wikipedia told me how wrong I was just now and it’s more aimed towards maintaining the status quo in relation to a certain period in time. In Western democracies often means protecting organised religion, nuclear family, property rights, rule of law etc.

So it’s more of an umbrella term for people who don’t want to change anything or even bring back some previous state.

Andrew Heywood’s book “The Conservative Mind” from 1953 denotes it as

• A belief in a transcendent order, which Kirk described variously as based in tradition, divine revelation, or natural law;

• An affection for the “variety and mystery” of human existence;

• A conviction that society requires orders and classes that emphasize natural distinctions;

• A belief that property and freedom are closely linked;

• A faith in custom, convention, and prescription, and a recognition that innovation must be tied to existing traditions and customs, which entails a respect for the political value of prudence

With all that said it’s a pretty garbage political philosophy and pretty regressive.