This is a rather natural conclusion once you realize all grammar rules are decided by some committee somewhere. They’re not some law of nature. That being said, it also pains me greatly to find mistakes in my own text.

I don’t disagree with you, but I feel like we’re talking about different things. My focus is on what the general population sees and feels, yours is in on the legislative impact of the administration. The effects of those laws are of course felt now, but not many can draw the line back to the Bush administration when making the next voting decision. Contrast this to the Iran war, where the gas prices rose within weeks or days.

Yes, it’s definitely a continuum and important to keep in mind. Thinking ahead, we don’t yet know what kind of ripple effects we see from the current administrator in 15-20 years…

Yep, the reason I don’t want to mention Europe here is because Bush was and still is pretty widely despised in Europe as it is. I feel like the US still looks back at him with some nostalgia (remember how funny he was in that golf video?), but IMO it’s just because they didn’t really face any direct repercussions. Even if they paid trillions for his stupid wars, the effect was more indirect.

You clearly have forgotten the horrors of the tan suit and the chaos of the Dijon mustard.

Most people didn’t believe he’d win in 2016, so they had no plan. They were ready for the second time.

Well, he caused about a million deaths and countless refugees from the Middle East. The chaos just didn’t reach the US in the same way as the one caused by Pedolf Diddler.

Did you create this with AI? They just removed the one I made, as it appears to be a rule here.

Yeah, like probably half of the this community’s content…

Care to explain?

Well if I was running against any of them, I’d just remind the public every time possible about the disastrous war they lost.

Then again, not all important positions are elected and some voters are really really fucking stupid, so it might be too much to hope for.

No one in this administration has any future in politics once Trump is gone.

If that was the end result of this war Israel more or less started, it would be just too good. I don’t know if I could handle that after Ukraine starting to bomb Moscow and US losing to Iran.

You could be a bit specific. Now it’s hard to tell if you’re for real, or some right wing Putin’s bitch who just wants to rock the boat.

Looks like Netanyahu also got to learn how Trump treats his allies.

Hard disagree. Hillary would have been very similar to Biden. Worse than Bernie, but pretty much status quo.

There was an article in WP or NYT in March detailing the meeting where Netanyahu sold the war to Trump.

Nothing absolves the US from the crimes in this war. I’m pointing out Netanyahu’s role, since he has probably made Israel yet again less secure by ultimately handing Iran a stronger hand. But he also supported Hamas back in the day to replace moderate Palestinian voices with extremists. Didn’t turn out so well for the ordinary citizens of Israel.

Plus lifted sanctions and likely the right to profit from safe passage over Hormuz.

Trump didn’t lose, but the US did.

Yep, but his biggest blunder was to trust Trump to help him out all the way. What makes Netanyahu a moron in my books is that now after a few years Iran will be stronger and led by military. It will hurt Israel in the long term.