• Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Term limits give lobbyists more power and increase the effectiveness of money in politics.

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Term limits will also make the last term of a lawmaker unanswerable in any way to voters so they can sell out. For executive positions they make sense as executives can rig the game and create patronage networks that keep them in office indefinitely. For legislatures it’s a horrible idea that will make things worse.

      • dmtalon@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Sell out assuming the fist part isn’t fixed (taking the non salary money out making it illegal for it to be lucrative

    • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Other way around, preventing people from forming decades long relationships with lobbyists reduces their effectiveness.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Does it? Seems to me that it’d speed up the representative to commercial position pipeline.

        • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The commercial position pipeline is the aftermath of the problem. When an industry like Big Tobacco can call up someone their long time government whore McConnell, they know he will put out every time. If they have to contend with someone new every few years, you might get a few people who have actual principles, and tell them to pound sand.

          If we get enough of principled people, we can end lobbying for good.