• AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’d ask you what in this gives you the impression that it’s an AI answer, but I don’t see there as being any point because the comment you’re replying to is patently obviously writing that themselves — you’re just not willing to meaningfully engage in a conversation.

      I would really encourage you to go back and reread the comment you replied to, because I think that person wrote something that was quite thoughtful and insightful. If you disagree with their points, then that’s your prerogative, but maybe that could lead to some productive discussion.

      I get why your instinct was to disregard the comment — there’s so much AI slop around nowadays clamouring for our attention that it’s easy to become guarded against the potential of wasting our time reading something that no-one even bothered to write. It’s an inevitable (and unfortunately often necessary) defense mechanism in our current information ecosystem. In this case though, I am confident that this is a false positive, and that the comment you’re replying to isn’t AI. I’m writing this because I would find it a shame if someone spent the time to write a thoughtful reply to you and you didn’t spend the time to actually try to hear what they’re saying.

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          You know, if you wanted to avoid taking part in discussions with other people, starting a substack would probably be a better choice than commenting on posts here.