The cuts represent about 10% of Bosch’s total workforce in the country, and 3% of its staff worldwide. Workers’ representatives vowed to resist the cuts, labelling them ‘unprecedented.’

German industrial giant Bosch said Thursday, September 25, it would cut 13,000 jobs, mostly in its auto unit, in the latest blow for the country’s ailing car sector.

The auto industry in Europe’s biggest economy has been hammered by fierce competition in key market China, weak demand and a slower than expected shift to electric vehicles.

The cuts, all of which will take place in Germany, represent about 10% of Bosch’s total workforce in the country, and 3% of its staff worldwide.

Bosch − the world’s biggest auto supplier, making everything from braking and steering systems to sensors − said the layoffs were needed to help make annual savings of €2.5 billion in the group’s car unit.

  • bigbabybilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    You mean all of us average earners aren’t buying $80,000 electric cars in droves during this time of insane inflation? Weird!

    • itztalal@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      China actually has electric cars with 300km range for under $20k.

      We’re not allowed to buy them in the West because it would show us all how much we’re getting ripped off by our rulers.

      We really are stupid and paying the price everyday.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        There’s more to this than JUST that. Not that you’re wrong of course.

        China subsidizes heavily because they want to be the only relevant player in the global EV market. These cars would cost closer to their non-Chinese counterparts if China wasn’t doing this.

        In global economics, this is considered unfair, and is usually retaliated against via tariffs.

        • A7thStone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          Why wouldn’t we let them in too drain the Chinese economy then. We would “win” in the short term by getting vehicles with fewer emissions while siphoning money out of the Chinese economy. Later when they could no longer afford to offer the vehicles at such a low price another company would step in with a superior product. At least that’s what I’ve been taught about how capitalism works. Was that all a lie?

          • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            The situation is a lot more complicated than that. On big enough scales (globally), it’s not actually about the money at all. The countries can literally just print arbitrary amounts of paper money, so money is no concern at all.

            What is a concern, however, is everything else. There’s jobs, the way that countries perform on the international stage (geopolitical aspects), future prospects, people’s quality of life, and much much more. All of that matters and is not really mapped to economic numbers such as money. That’s why these micro-economic attempts fail when trying to apply them to the global level.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            The Chinese government can afford to pay their manufacturers 10-20k euros per car indefinitely, there’s no real limit to how much money they have. They’ll continue until every western manufacturer is bankrupt.

            Later when they could no longer afford to offer the vehicles at such a low price another company would step in with a superior product. At least that’s what I’ve been taught about how capitalism works. Was that all a lie?

            I know you probably realize this, but no. It’s not how capitalism works in the real world. In the real world, when you have products that cost billions to develop before production, it’s nearly impossible for a new company to be competitive against a monopoly. And if the Chinese give away semi-free cars to everyone for a decade, everyone else goes bankrupt and they have a monopoly. OR other countries start sacrificing other budget items so they could subsidize their domestic car manufacturing and we just have… even more cars on the roads and less public transit, less walkable cities. Yay!

        • Miaou@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          The west: throws billions of tax payers money for decades at auto industry

          stimulating the economy

          China: tries to do the same

          unfair capitalism!!!

          If it makes Yankees feel better, they should just mentally add a “TM” mark next to “China” when talks about subsidies arise.

          BTW the Dacia spring is priced similarly to the Chinese models. Maybe it’s not simply China bad, maybe it’s the western manufacturers who lost their dominion.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 days ago

            Dacia is a western manufacturer lol, Renault is French.

            Who threw billions in tax money at Mercedes? Audi? BMW?

  • Corridor8031@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    I quickly looked it up and i saw a report that bosh received almost a billion in subsidies, not sure which time period tho. And it said the company had 2024 3,4 billion in profit.

    so i assumr they will have to pay that money back now 🙃🙃