An approximately average, enthusiasticly participating man should be able to get 3 on there, with the uh, additional frosting nozzle still visible, or nearly so.
2? Below average.
1? Probably an actual, diagnosable micropeen.
4? Above average.
5? Something like 1 out of 10,000 in terms of how rare that level of above average is.
I mean, there are lots of studies on the distribution of male donut pole sizes, I’m just doing a rough comparison to the latest meta-analyses of such data.
You have inspired my autism.
Banana for scale?
Krispy Kreme Original Glazed Donut.
Extremely standardized, as far as donuts go.
Dimensions?
Outer Diameter = ~4 inches
Inner Diameter = ~ 1 inch
Height = ~ 1.5 inches
So…
An approximately average, enthusiasticly participating man should be able to get 3 on there, with the uh, additional frosting nozzle still visible, or nearly so.
2? Below average.
1? Probably an actual, diagnosable micropeen.
4? Above average.
5? Something like 1 out of 10,000 in terms of how rare that level of above average is.
… 6? More like 1 out of 1,000,000 in rarity.
How snug is the fit?
Somewhat snug?
Average.
Very snug, moderately noticable donut tearing?
Above Average.
Not snug? Loose?
Below Average.
Great, we’re halfway to publishing this thesis! Let’s send your analysis to a Tier 1 research journal ASAP!
/s :)
This will become the new ISO DickDonut measuring standard.
Sounds good to me, lol!
Economists have used the uh, “BigMac Index” with an increasing level of seriousness, over the last decades… so why not?
I mean, there are lots of studies on the distribution of male donut pole sizes, I’m just doing a rough comparison to the latest meta-analyses of such data.
I can provide sources…
… if you give me a donut.