Mozilla is in a tricky position. It contains both a nonprofit organization dedicated to making the internet a better place for everyone, and a for-profit arm dedicated to, you know, making money. In the best of times, these things feed each other: The company makes great products that advance its goals for the web, and the nonprofit gets to both advocate for a better web and show people what it looks like. But these are not the best of times. Mozilla has spent the last couple of years implementing layoffs and restructuring, attempting to explain how it can fight for privacy and openness when Google pays most of its bills, while trying to find its place in an increasingly frothy AI landscape.

Fun times to be the new Mozilla CEO, right? But when I put all that to Anthony Enzor-DeMeo, the company’s just-announced chief executive, he swears he sees opportunity in all the upheaval. “I think what’s actually needed now is a technology company that people can trust,” Enzor-DeMeo says. “What I’ve seen with AI is an erosion of trust.”

Mozilla is not going to train its own giant LLM anytime soon. But there’s still an AI Mode coming to Firefox next year, which Enzor-DeMeo says will offer users their choice of model and product, all in a browser they can understand and from a company they can trust. “We’re not incentivized to push one model or the other,” he says. “So we’re going to try to go to market with multiple models.”

-_-

  • criss_cross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    “What I’ve seen with AI is an erosion of trust.”

    Mozilla is not going to train its own giant LLM anytime soon. But there’s still an AI Mode coming to Firefox next year, which Enzor-DeMeo says will offer users their choice of model and product, all in a browser they can understand and from a company they can trust. “We’re not incentivized to push one model or the other,” he says. “So we’re going to try to go to market with multiple models.” Some will be open-source models available to anyone.

    This is such an out of touch non-answer here.

    People don’t oppose ai changes because they’re locked into a model. In fact most AI products I use for my job let you choose a fucking model.

    People hate them because

    A) 90% of the time they’re useless and the remaining 10 are detrimental to the product experience

    B) Ethical concerns about training off of artists and authors as well as environmental impact. EDIT: or also the general trend of trying to replace humans with AI.

    C) Not wanting to play into the fucking arms race the billionaire class are manufacturing

    D) The time they could be useful they have a risk of being either hilariously wrong or dangerously wrong. And there’s no amount of training and GPU manufacturing that’s gonna fix that.

    Absolutely none of this is addressed by the CEO. I’m sure he has to say this because of the fucking tulip crazy money is in around this but it doesn’t make it any less tone deaf or futile.

  • Tonava@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Programs are like socks, once they get dirty, you change them. Do these people really not understand how this stuff works? Even giants can fall when enough people switch to other options

  • 𝚝𝚛𝚔@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve cancelled my monthly donation to Mozilla. What’s the point. Every bit of feedback I’ve provided is to the tune of no goddamn AI, spend my money towards keeping up with the alternatives to make sure there’s always an extra player in the field. Instead it’s going to some overpaid dickhead who’s going to introduce AI.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      firefox is almostly completely dependant on google through ad revenue, hence thats why the sudden jump into AI, which google is trying to jam into all its services.

  • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    7 days ago

    Mozilla is completely detached from its user base. They think their average user is a Microsoft enthusiast when in reality it’s a Debian enjoyer.

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Is there like a petition or something we can all sign to show that literally no cunt wants this?

    • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Uninstall it and pick a different platform. These cunts think you won’t and THATS why they don’t give a fuck. Enough people swap and oh, hey, maybe we should rethink this mistake. If not - not your problem… You already bounced.

      • kieron115@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        If anyone has any suggestions for browsers hook me up, I’m running out of browsers with thier own engines to try. I don’t see much point in using, say, LibreWolf if the engine is still the same as Firefox (Gecko in this case). Maybe I’ll give NetSurf a try and pretend like it’s 1996 again.

        edit i don’t see much point because doing some about:config shenanigans is nearly the same amount of work to me as switching browsers.

        • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          If all of the web engines enshittify, you can always curl the HTML/CSS/JS and hand-parse it. Might have suboptimal performance however.

        • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I’m afraid that not using Gecko or Blink may expose me to any sort of malware while visiting the web tbh

          • kieron115@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 days ago

            That’s still a fork of Firefox, isn’t it? I was hoping to find a reasonably modern browser that doesn’t rely on gecko or blink. I’d be okay with a WebKit browser but I don’t have a Mac.

            • kieron115@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              I do, in fact. I get that they are typically open-source, and I also understand how ridiculously difficult it is to create one from scratch. If LibreWolf or whoever want to make privacy focused browsers based on mozilla foundation or google’s work then that’s fine and I support it, but I’m personally curious if there are any mainstream browsers that don’t have any (or minimal) reliance on google and mozilla foundation. Someone pointed me towards an engine in development Servo which looks quite interesting! Hopefully there will be a browser based on it soon.

              https://www.spacebar.news/servo-undercover-web-browser-engine/

              At the start of the millennium, Internet Explorer used its own Trident engine on Windows and Tasman on Mac, Opera used Presto, some embedded devices used NetFront, Netscape had Gecko, and KDE made KHTML for its Konqueror browser. Those browsers eventually faded away or adopted a competing engine to simplify development. KHTML was the basis for Safari’s WebKit, which in turn became Chromium’s Blink engine, and Netscape’s Gecko engine became the foundation for Firefox. Opera ditched its custom Presto engine in 2013 and switched to Chromium, and Microsoft Edge made the same move in 2020.

              This is a danger to the open web in more ways than one. If there is only one functioning implementation of a standard, the implementation becomes the standard. The web becomes to Google what Java is to Oracle. It also means the limitations and security flaws in Chromium affect most other browsers, which became a topic of conversation with Google’s recent Manifest V3 transition.

              • ikidd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 days ago

                I figured you did. It’s the guy you were replying to that seems confused.

                • kieron115@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Oh shit my bad! Leaving the info up anyway, in case anyone else is wondering why only two major engines is a bad thing for the open internet.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      They all just do the same exact predictable thing. It’s always the shittiest thing for everyone but the “share holders”. Just automate them away and call it a day at this point.

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    7 days ago

    Just like I said in another post related to this, I hope this doesn’t kill LibreWolf, IceCat, and Waterfox.

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Power users don’t want it.

      Regular users say they don’t want it but actions don’t lie. They love AI. They love the slop. They just don’t want to be reminded that that’s what it is.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    Of course, this is just what Firefox needs fixing long standing issues, catching up to web standards, process isolation on mobile AI!

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s almost as if they are out of touch with their users. I don’t get it. CEOs are just normal people like us.

    /s

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 days ago

      Given what Microsoft is smoking these days, no AI would be a selling point, and Mozilla does not seem to realize they are playing with fire. Their userbase chose their product instead of using the system defaults of Chrome, Safari, and Internet Exploder. Their users, just like Lemmy, are tech-litrrate and more socially concious than the masses. If an alternative or fork appears, with sufficent support, and Mozilla does not put the breaks on their AI train, were all just going to jump ship. We do it every time a new OS is installed, there is no Firefox loyalty, only lesser evils.

      • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s hard to imagine being so butthurt at a piece of now-defunct, 20-year-old software that you pretend it still is the default just so you can call it a dumb name.

        • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          I was in the trenches for that nonsense fixing stuff daily because of them. Oracles wacky tacky shit that kept their users locked to Java 7.21 for a decade past the support date. Bloated language packs and not being able to keep up with basic HTML tags… You dont know how good yall have it today.

          I dont care how much MS dresses up Edge, we know its just Chrome in a poorly fitted suit. The old addage still holds true, Microsofts default browser (formerly IE, currently Edge) is the best browser to use to go download another browser.

          [This concludes grumpy old tech speech]

          • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            I can absolutely get behind hating oracle. Not only was oracle always evil, they also prop java which is terrible. And now the family has gotten into MAGA propaganda. It’s an awful family and company and product.

            IE hasn’t been a thing for like a decade though. The war is over. You won. You’re safe now.

            I disagree with your description of edge though. It’s more like the evil version of inspector gadget. Like if he was corrupted by the oracle corporation and every gadget was turned nefarious. This kinda breaks down because chrome is also evil but whatever I still think it works.