This ruling is important because it finally brings to the floor that it is not at a valid presumption that local cops cannot enforce the law on federal agents. In the last year, the narrative that “herpaderp supremacy clause means states and cities can’t do anything to enforce law on someone claiming to be a fed” has so normalized a totally unproven and unsupported extension of the supremacy clause that it’s become hard to even bring this up in municipal conversations.

There is absolutely no data scientist, data engineer, or dev in the “AI space” that has turned down a million+ salary because of the state’s mild marginal tax rate bump. Like, jfc, these pissbabies

Coupled to a highly progressive tax, a wealth floor, and UBI, and we got something really cooking!

This is a distressingly unusually solid analysis for lemmy. I agree with one exception–writing to memory absolutely counts as a distribution. Accordingly, if a generative model output an infringing work, it for sure could create liability for infringement. I think this will ultimately work similarly to music copyright where conscious/explicitly intentional copying is not itself the threshold test, but rather degree of similarity. And if you have prompts that specifically target towards infringement, you’re going to get some sort of contributory infringement structure. I think there is also potentially useful case law to look at in terms of infringement arising out of work-for-hire situations, where the contractor may not have infringed intentionally but the supervisor knew and intended their instructions to produce an effectively infringing work. That is, if there is any case law on this pretty narrow fact pattern.

I mean, sure, they also charge for a profit rather than as a social good. My point is just that everyone pooling together resources through regular payments when they don’t need health assistance so that when they do they can pull from it to get the coverage they need is literally the foundation for how insurance works at the abstract and perhaps is a good indicator of why privatized for-profit insurance makes no fucking sense.

It’s literally the methodology of…insurance.

Effectively, this has been an ongoing initiative across DoTs for a long while now. The issue is that it’s a hodgepodge approach baked piecemeal into various grants and other programs. But, yeah, digital, vendor agnostic, secure transit infrastructure is always on a lot of DOT folks’ minds.