What’s the name of the post and what did it link to? “Informational video” screams YouTube.

Rule 4 might be referencing their site wide rule against spam and ads.

Publishers usually get about 85 to 90% of the revenue on printed books, and 75% of the revenue on ebooks.

If using copyrighted data becomes illegal, they will get 100% of the profit from selling their data most likely.

This book should be aimed at them.

You’re barking up the wrong tree if you think I have trouble admitting I’m kinda gay for femboys. You are a weak person bro, both mentally and probably physically.

Nothing wrong with a guy dressing like a girl, you loser. I know it confuses you when you get a boner but boys in skirts are actually a really cool and fun thing. This isn’t the platform for your puritanical insecurities.

Are you hoping Meta or the copyright industry wins this case? Maybe I misunderstood.

I mean a loss for meta is technically a win for everyone most of the time but I’d expect more pragmatism in this case.

None of that matter if, right now, you are cheering on copyright laws. There’s no reason to stop promoting change now.

Encouraging laws you don’t like does nothing but cement them. We are currently, as a society, begging lawmakers for harder copyright laws.

I get the Justice system sucks but making the wrong laws stronger does not make it better.

Think about what you are saying is all, you tend to write long elaborate speeches on why copyright deserves to win. There is being critical of AI, and then there’s being a mouthpiece for copyright companies. I’m not trying to be mean here, sorry.

Obviously, the losers against this would be highly transphobic and homophobic. It must be rough having to create an other handful of alts each time you want your “contributions” to have any upvotes.

We don’t get better laws if everyone is cheering for the copyright industry. Everything after your first point goes against that. Goliath, the same one that beat up Aaron, finally has a match in his own weight category, and you are hoping he wins basically.

It’s weird that your take away is “Meta needs to get it” and not “Clearly, these laws work for no one”. You don’t get better copyright laws by cheering for the copyright companies.

Aaron wouldn’t be part of the side that wants to lock up all data behind a giant gate and give the keys to a handful of companies. Well, we don’t know what he would think, but I’m guessing he didn’t lean copyright.

They didn’t say seeding is fair use, just inherently part of torrenting. Good thing Sarah Silverman has pc gamer there to pander for her.

To be fair, they were popular at first because they were highly convenient. I remember Uber as the first to have a GPS map that told you where your taxi was. Most taxi companies and hotels were seriously lagging behind in terms of use of technology.

That being said, they were malicious companies from the start and the whole business angle was built on taking advantage of loopholes. I’d be fine with a lot of them if they were nationally owned companies though.

Better term would probably be generative AI to also cover music, video and my grandmother’s soul.

The whole area has little food security and no water security. A few desalination plants have already been hit iirc. It’s going to be a huge crisis.

One explanation I heard was that it was very close to a naval base and almost all the students were kids of high ranked officers. They killed their kids to send them a message.

I can’t find the video in the article to confirm, but I also heard it was double tapped.

Would you ban a user who felt an obligation to take a more active role in downvoting vegan content?

There’s a huge amount of Brigadoon related to AI content. People downvote and stalk the communities instead of just blocking them. I think the heavy handedness is justified, and I’ve even been on the wrong side of it (getting banned for posting in fuck AI).

I don’t know why the autocorrect gave me that but I’m keeping it.

I’m not pro-copyright. I actually steal content, as in pirate it and then watch it. I don’t consider it stealing to do it to train AI on it tbh.

“Our” data implies we collectively own it, yet we don’t, copyright companies for the most part do.

To be fair, I did say inherently part of. It would have been rude of them not to seed.

Your definition excludes a lot of genocides, including the Holocaust, unless the SS are to be considered an unorganized group of civilians. Bosnia, Armania, Cambodia, most except Rwanda.

Of course, that would exclude Gaza as well.

I’d say who is targeted and for what purpose is more important. Targeting military installation vs purely civilian targets like refugee camps for instance.