

I see. Thank you!
Do you work with any energetics?
A very old enzyme. Still fixing inorganic carbon in the biosphere through yet another mass extinction. Still grabbing the wrong molecule on occasion. Anyway, here are some more phosphoglycerates.
Kill your lawn, grow a garden. As you do this, look within and do the same.
I see. Thank you!
Do you work with any energetics?
Apparently not the first time.
Sucks that Ukraine might see fewer shells from this.
https://www.aesys.biz/products
Our portfolio includes a comprehensive range of energetics based on HMX, HNS, PETN, RDX, and TNT.
Energetics. Yeah that’s one way of putting it.
Not quite Oppau, but close.
It doesn’t take in to account at all those who abstained.
Abstained? You mean helped Reagan win? How’d that strategy work out?
And it doesn’t list by generation just by 10-year increments.
False. Behold, arithmetic!
1980 election
Age (DOB) Range
18-21 (1962-1959) =3
22-29 (1958-1951) =7
30-44 (1950-1936) =14
45-59 (1935-1921) =14
60+ (1920-past)
1984 election
Age (DOB) Range
18-24 (1966-1960) =6
25-29 (1959-1955) =4
30-49 (1954-1935) =19
50-64 (1934-1920) =14
65+ (1919-past)
What they lack is a neat cutoff at 1945.
And generations don’t fall into neat 10-year increments.
No one is doing that.
Wikipedia:
The generation is often defined as people born from 1946 to 1964 during the mid-20th-century baby boom that followed the end of World War II.
More arithmetic! 1964-1946=18
At that point in time boomers were anywhere from 20 to 35.
1945-1960. Sure. Seems a breath away from a neat ten year increment, but sure.
I disagree.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_boomers
In 1980, it was kinda close, 45v44 (18-21yo) and 44v44 (22-29yo), but I wouldn’t say they were “overwhelmingly against”. By 1984 they seemed quite in favor of him. They had help, no doubt, but they were not largely against; marginally against at most.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_United_States_presidential_election
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_United_States_presidential_election
Ahhh, that makes sense. It sounds like a very interesting line of work.
Yeah, very curious how this happened.