Twongo [she/her]

back then we called it “swinging” and it wasn’t rare.

now it’s an open relationship or “relationship anarchy”

i’m not a swinger. tried it. never will be. glad people can enjoy it.

there’s no “right way” to have a relationship.

how did u know i got banned?

Imagine getting sent up because a pos rj45 cable got hit by a micrometeorite

i agree with the username part :) that´s a mistake on my behalf

i just did though.

call it “moving the goalpost” because it´s not directly a 3-letter agency. but they are funded by the US Government in shady ways - with the same result i was talking about, which is: Falun Gong is a US backed Cult that actively wants to paint China in a bad light. Falun Gong Members are not a trusted source about China.

It´s like asking AIPAC Members about Gaza.

i asked you to “name one of these occurences” since i may not be aware of your dozens of examples through history. you provided nothing related to it.

I admit the term “CIA” backed was a hyperboly. Yet Falun Gong is funded by the US Government and associated with US Propaganda outlets.

https://www.npr.org/2021/04/14/986982387/falun-gong-steve-bannon-and-the-trump-era-battle-over-internet-freedom

funny how it also shows the financial ties to Radio Free Asia

I could also provide the wikipedia article about Falun Gong :)

are you aware of falun gong and what they stand for or do you blindly believe what confirms your bias?

we have documents of nazis and unit 731 doing inhumane experiments on people during wartime, but not an industrial scale organ trade

name one of these occurences. keep in mind the timeline and when it became possible to donate organs.

falun gong

a CIA backed cult. Good source

my point is: “systemmatic organ harvesting by making unwanted people disappear on a mass scale” is looney tunes type conspiracy shit.

xi jinping is a cartoon villain now

i guess their answer was so bad they deleted it. it also wasn’t about organ harvesting at all, just “china bad” lol

deleted my response. not screaming into the void.

i don’t wanna sound like a dick: i read it all, it’s still all from the same newspaper, the wiki link leads to nowhere and it’s not connected to systemmatic organ harvesting.

it is describing mass surveillance in a region which was ravaged by islamic terrorism. but why is there no outrage about the same stuff happening in western countries on a larger scale? (palantir). mass surveillance is horrible, i agree. but it’s all around us. if china does it tho they have to be singled out.

i’m not trying to do a whataboutism here but if a “good state” did this in a region with a high terror threat it’d be generally considered fine and necessary. (war on terror)

ok. there’s a chinese police station in ireland, which is odd. but at the same time europeans have to make peace with US bases which do far more. but china is painted as absolute evil while we’ve been occupied, economically controlled and monitored by a foreign nation since ww2. (rammstein, patch barracks…)

another false equivalency. every superpower tends to fail in places, it is unfortunately inevitable and i hope technological progress will someday reduce the harm people inflict on others (it won’t happen)

i can’t say anything on the 1989 protests as the provided source is not working.

it’s not like i made up my mind but the main point: “systemmatic organ harvesting by making unwanted people disappear on a mass scale” still sounds highly conspiratorial and you did not refute that, you just added more “china bad” into this exchange.

the claims made in this article are outlandish, the author does not cite any sources, he’s just assuming.

While there are substantial claims that organs may be harvested from deceased prisoners without consent, the claims in this article are really out there.

I love to be proven wrong btw.

helpful.

define “fascism” and tell ne how this term applies to china.

you won’t convince me if we have two completely differing definitions of that term

yet china has 10x less billionaires per capita than the US. china is also not known for putting billionaires in the spotlight or letting them dictate policy. also: in the context of how china developed through the 20th century until today it´s more than impressive how china advanced the material conditions of regular workers. i am not denying that exploitation of labour happens to an extend, but it is neither encouraged nor as rampant as in western countries. china claims to be socialist “with chinese character” but they are capitalist after all, this includes all the failings of the system. but with extra guardrails.

i agree in that regard, nordstream was really bugging america and they could foresee this happening if germany and russia ever cut their business relations.

but in context to the “china is winning” meme it’s funny to observe how america constantly shoots itself in the foot for fringe ideological reasons despite the fact everyone and their grandma could foresee the consequences

ok… but do you have more substantial arguments with less polemics?