Coco

Beijing says its new ethnic unity law protects “the legitimate rights and interests of all ethnic groups” and “does not undermine ethnic minorities’ use of their own language.”

When asked about the potential for “long-arm jurisdiction” at a press conference Monday, Vice Minister of Justice Hu Weilie said it aligns with the basic norms of international law for countries to protect their sovereignty.

I read this to mean that the law is in place to do what they can to prevent outside agents from intentionally sewing separatist beliefs, as in outside groups (like maybe the CIA) sending people in that try and break up the unity of the larger Republic of China into smaller groups based on racist or ethic differences.

The statement from Beijing explicitly states it allows the minorities to practice their own language, and the 56 officially recognized minorities are considered part of the Chinese culture under this law, and protects those cultures.

China is constantly being battered on all sides by other agents from outside of their borders attempting to convince small areas to succede or separate from the Republic, and this bill is in place to prevent ethnic division on those grounds.

that’s my reading.

It bans acts that “undermine ethnic unity or create ethnic division” among China’s 56 officially recognized ethnicities

Lol. Legal protection for minorities framed as a bad thing.

So I’m reading basically:

• yes draft

• yes eugenics

• yes war

• yes religion

• no free anything

• no social services

• no shaming rich people

• no cultural humility

Also, the definition of “peace” in there is suspect

Well, I’m a Land Back lefty, so yeah… I definitely do think America and its values should fuck right off.

“One day, everyone will have always been against this.”

Cool. Now what are we gonna do about it?

Call it OOOOOoooooooklahoma!

I like the idea of having scaling types of specificity for different diagnoses. Being able to diagnose a vague and broad range to be specified later will be helpful for mental health triage and emergency services.

However, the biomarkers inclusion feels very much bordering eugenics. The article points out that its inclusion is controversial, but doesn’t mention the word “eugenic” at all.

I am of the honest opinion that whatever history considers the “first act” of WW3 has already occurred, whether it be boat bombings, leader abductions, or something else I don’t even know about.

Should just keep going and tear the whole thing down. Don’t think we need it anymore.