[deleted]

So when internet search is replaced with AI chat, how are we supposed to check?

Why are we doing anything with AI if we have to check it for accuracy every time?

laughs in Firefox/Librewolf

Takes a stand by sitting down.

Trump is the harmful kind of joke, like those that perpetuate racist stereotypes.

How about an atheist exemption?

You can be proud of fooling someone like me who had not had enough coffee yet into thinking you were serious, well played.

Adding a horizontal reflecting shelf the length of the hallway is far less likely than lining up reflections. It doesn’t even make sense.

If you start with the hallway floor and then mark out the same distance as a reflection it all matches up.

It looks like it from the perspective, but there is no shelf. All the reflections just line up to look that way.

More verbose does not imply that is is more clear, it is often rambling and not even accurate.

Probably costs .1% more.

EMERGENCY

AIO

Gordon Gekko from Wallstreet

Plus she didn’t even fire!

The bubble already sucks and it popping will suck differently.

Have any of their super models lived up to the hype?

Of course this one won’t either.

Audible listening.

They could use reliable sources to approach 100% instead of jamming literally everything in. For example, limiting the training data to peer reviewed papers would not be exactly 100% but it would be a lot closer than including all of reddit.

I missed that one, but saw the foot rest.

At least in the US the marriage contract gives a massive ton of legal access to shared things, discounts, medical decisions, and a bunch of other stuff. You can kind of come close by spending a bunch of money on legal documentation, but still not exactly the same.