• isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 hours ago

      All the hacking risk of keeping your money in a regular bank, but none of the protections that come from reversible transactions and KYC laws.

        • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Not in the context I’m alluding to. With conventional banking, the only place to move money to is another bank. You can withdraw cash at an ATM, but large transfers have to go to another bank. If someone hacks my bank account and initiates a large transfer, that transaction can be reversed. And moreover, it will be going to an account at another bank that is owned by a known customer.

          But crypto exchanges must have the ability to transfer to unvetted crypto wallets. No crypto customer would accept an exchange that simply didn’t let you transfer coins to your own private wallet. So even though the accounts themselves have KYC, you can still hack a crypto account and send the entire balance to an unknown person.

          The equivalent for regular banks would be if your regular bank offered you the option to send a large cash withdrawal to a physical address of your choice. Enter any address, and any amount of your funds can be sent to any address you specify. The closest banks have to that is bill pay, and even that is just a bank to bank transfer in the form of a check in the mail.

          The closest real banks actually get to this is wire transfers, and those are pretty locked down nowadays. They often require going to a physical branch, showing ID, etc in order to initiate a wire transfer. They’re locked down precisely because they’re the one irreversible transaction built into the regular banking system.

          Crypto bros often fail to realize what actually secures the banking system. The banking system is not secured by foolproof cryptography. The cryptographic security of crypto solves a problem that doesn’t exist. Every bank is not the gold standard of IT security. Rather, what really secures the banking system is that there’s not much you can actually do with stolen bank login credentials. Pretty much every way you could move money out of said bank account would require you to show your face somewhere or transfer funds to an account traced to your real ID. And pretty much any method of moving money out of a bank account can be reversed.

          • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            The cryptographic security of crypto solves a problem that doesn’t exist.

            The point of crypto wasn’t to be more secure than money, it was the ability to move it around without having to rely on a third party allowing you to, and charging a large fee for the privilege.

            • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Yet we’re talking now about crypto exchanges, which is just another word for bank. And the fees you pay to move money via Bitcoin are far higher than the fees you pay to move money using the conventional banking system.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The people actually buying and selling crypto don’t care about the decentralized part nor the currency part, it’s just an extremely speculative investment vehicle.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Seriously (why are you downvoted?). How do you even go about refunds or fraudulent charges in crypto? Are you essentially powerless against scammers and thieves/hackers?

      Apparently private wallets are not safe as those are seemingly hacked most commonly, every virus and crack looks for it. Online exchanges get constantly hacked and online wallets have a tendency to randomly rug pull.

      Entire crypto scene is basically banking but “we got blackjack and hookers so we are better”

    • ChaosMonkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is a centralized exchange. This attack could be mitigated by encouraging users to move their funds to their own wallets.

      • copingwithelmons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        But yeah, he’s gotta point. Why don’t central banks loose money like this? Is it because their cash isn’t in a Blockchain?

        • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Because it’s the bank, financial institutions and the trail of transactions registered to known entities who say whose the money is. For crypto you only need the keys and it is yours.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Banks also have control of their own ledgers and can just issue a reversal transaction. If it’s between two banks, it’ll be more complex, but overall that’s still the case

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Since crypto is more of a trading asset than currency, they’re not that useful in your own wallet because then you constantly need to move them in/out of the exchange and pay all the fees related to those transactions.

        Yeah yeah “actually they’re currency” blah blah, except they’re not really usable as currency in the functional real world (just like stocks)

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Closest by far is Monero. They are actually willing to spend it as a currency, and when looking at statistics from companies that accept different cryptocurrencies, Monero is always either number one or number two on the list.

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            22 hours ago

            companies that accept different cryptocurrencies

            But this is the issue, that’s like 0.0001% of possible places you can use your funds (probably I’m way too generous with that number), and none of it to not die from hunger, cold or dehydration.

            And the volatility is still absolutely absurd for something to be used as currency, like all other Cryptos it is dominated by instability and speculation to an excessive degree.

            • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              I have been buying groceries through giftcards for over 3 years now and i have not died of hunger or dehydration. The cold is admittedly a bit harder. I dont have that one figured out yet.

              But I am able to take my Monero and use it to interact with the brands and companies that everybody else uses.

              What I was saying above is that for companies that accept different types of cryptocurrency directly, Monero is always in the top one or two spot.

              • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                I have been buying groceries through giftcards for over 3

                Fair enough, this seems very regionally specific though. I can only buy gift cards for local supermarkets with my credit card for example. And in all the countries I’ve been to (granted mostly on the European continent) I’ve never seen an option for using crypto for gift cards.

        • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          they’re not that useful in your own wallet because then you constantly need to move them in/out of the exchange and pay all the fees related to those transactions.

          Hot wallets are for small amounts for daily spending

          It’s the same as constantly going to the ATM to get cash in your wallet…

          Nobody carries around their whole net worth in their pockets

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            What that statement ment was, that you can’t use it to invest and diversify you portfolio if its not in an exchange. So unless you keep the majority in the exchange, you can’t trade it without paying the transaction fees every time.