Got banned from !energy@slrpnk.net for pointing out that it was a big reach to say that wind power is included in the term “solar energy”. The mod referenced a temp ban from two years ago? Tried to say I’ve got a “history” of trolling and harassment, as well that I “doxxed” user DMs which also happened two years ago. I even, at the time, talked with the mod involved and reposted that comment without the DM screenshots. Like I don’t have an entirely squeaky clean modlog but it’s only a single page over two years? What the fluff? Like it’s a two week ban and I could hardly care but jeeze this feels like overreach.

https://slrpnk.net/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=518329

  • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    A two week ban because you said you think calling wind energy “solar” is a reach?

    Yeah, PTB, no question.

  • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Looks like a pretty obvious case of PTB for me…

    The reasoning given is even more of a reach than “wind=solar”.

    • Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s really not a reach though, wind is created by the sun heating Earth. It’s a bit pedantic maybe but it’s not a reach, it’s direct cause and effect.

      It’s not a reach to say something that is technically correct. To say something is a reach or a stretch is to imply it is not entirely true or is not precise. The sun literally powers the wind on earth, it is just as much a reach to call a penguin a bird.

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You have to go pretty far into pedantry… Which makes it a huge reach.

        Its a valid comment to say its a reach, and also extremely valid to say this mod was reaaaaaaaccchhhing with their actions.

  • TabbsTheBat (they/them)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you think about it, oil is just rotting plants, and what do plants use to grow? That’s right - the sun. Therefore burning oil is solar energy uwu

    Seriously tho, even if there was a reasonable argument to be had for “wind = solar” banning someone for discussion about the topic is a certified powertrip clsssic

  • AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh snap I commented on that post! Literally every comment on it has been people pointing that out, I had a whole conversation with the OP being annoyed that people are focusing on that instead of the article itself (which IS fair from OPs side and understandably annoying), but that just highlights how stupid it is for a mod to ban you for it. Also shows arbitrary moderation that no one else got banned, dude had it in for you, definitely a PTB.

  • UniversalMonk@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    PTB.

    slrpnk seems to have lost it’s way. It was cool at first, but I don’t know what happened to them lately. They used to be cool and laid back. Now a lot of mods and admin over there have become PTB

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I am not the only admin on slrpnk 😅

        But look at who you are replying again 🤷

        • UniversalMonk@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I was on your instance for a good while and never broke any rules. The ban came out of nowhere and wasn’t even tied to anything recent. Because the only reason I ever got from you was, “because you’re Universal Monk.” So yeah, that’s classic PTB behavior.

          I agree with OP that their situation also looks like a clear case of PTB.

          (For the record, I’m much happier here anyway and have been welcomed by most of the dbzer0 community.)

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It was a mistake to approve your application in the first place given how you behave with your other accounts. When we noticed that mistake we took a while to discuss this internally with the other admins and community mods and ultimatly decided that we prefer not to be associated with you.

      • UniversalMonk@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They banned me out of the blue, even though I’d been on their instance for a while without breaking any rules. The reason they gave me was a variation of “you are Universal Monk.” That alone makes me think they’ve lost their way.

        Add that to OP’s situation and other things I’ve come across before, (though I’ll admit I don’t have the receipts right now), and it really seems like they’ve gone off course. Just my opinion, of course.

        • Blaze@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          They clarified their position in the comment below

          The comment reported in this post has been restored

          though I’ll admit I don’t have the receipts right now

          For someone complaining that they use “you are Universal Monk" to ban you, that seems a bit ironic to make such statements without anything to back it up.

  • teft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Like it’s a two week ban and I could hardly care but jeeze this feels like overreach.

    When you make a post about a ban a comment like this feels a little disingenuous.

    I agree with the mod that wind should be counted as solar since ultimately it is derived from the sun’s solar energy hitting the earth. Really though we should just call them renewable energy sources.

    I also agree with you though, that doesn’t seem like a comment worthy of a ban. I’d just wait the two weeks and not sweat it.

    • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree with the mod that wind should be counted as solar since ultimately it is derived from the sun’s solar energy hitting the earth.

      Idk by that definition we animal are all solar powered.

    • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think a large part of what this comm is for, is warning other users that a PTB exists in the first place. I’m a bit annoyed, but I can cope with the ban, it’s no skin off my back.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hydroelectric is also solar because the hydrologic cycle is dependent on solar evaporation of water to create rain clouds:

      Next up on Seven Degrees of Solar Energy

    • lividweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Like another poster said, oil is rotten plants, which grew from solar energy, so oil=solar.

      Nuclear power plants run on uranium. Uranium is produced during the merging of neutron stars. So nuclear=solar.

      Should we just say that all energy is solar? Or maybe we can just agree on some high-level categories to help differentiate between different concepts to make discussing them less confusing?