Because the privileged, who profit from the status-quo aren’t suffering, so why would they tolerate any violation-of the status-quo?
( prosecuting white-collar-crime, XOR abuse-of-autority, simply won’t ever happen under any establishment-regime, in proportion to the effect of the actual crime or abuse-of-authority:
Authority is a downward-chopping-axe, not the upright-double-edged-sword that the various statues of Justice pretend our world wields.
Gaslighting is the most-established “communication” establishment has formed the world with.
From the oligarchy/monarchy-is-best-for-the-masses of Adam Smith & Ronald Reagan, to the rule-of-legalism gaslighting about being rule-of-Just-law.
“There is no group so conservative as a group of radicals who just won rule of their own region.” has too much truth in it.
Humankind doesn’t have the SPINE to be loyal to objective-integrity, instead of being loyal to political/ideological motivation, according to the entire-ocean-of-evidence, does it? )
_ /\ _
Because then Capitalism wouldn’t exist.
Because international law is extremely difficult to enforce without causing an international conflict.
WW2 started because Germany invaded Poland and the UK said “Enough!”. Was the UK wrong to start the conflict? They weren’t attacked, or even under threat.
Yes. Enforcement means conflict.
The worst crime in war, which is prerequisite to guilt for any other crime, is losing
What is this word prosecuted?
In this case, to bring legal charges against.
That’s a thing we do?
Against who? Trump? Putin? Netanyahu? Lmao
Laws are optional for kings.
Crimes against the rich?
Prosecuting war crimes are only followed or ignored by those with the biggest guns and bombs.
