• Prox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Doesn’t it take 60 votes to end the filibuster (because the vote to end it would first be subject to it)?

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nope. A permanent rule change, as it stands, sure.

      But they can - and already have- used a simple majority vote to change cloture rules for specific votes., including things like trump’s presidential nominations.

      There is no reason they can’t do that here, except they don’t want to.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Because right now Trump can just decide what is “essential” and what isn’t.

          They’re just accelerating the totalitarian coup.