God it’s so time for a rewatch of this show.
Where is this from? I need to watch this show if it’s a show. Is it a show? Tell me it’s a show and which show it is please. 🙏
Bojack Horseman. Great show you won’t regret it.
“great show” yes very true.
“You won’t regret it”. Oh really? Sarah Lyn?.. Sara Lyn?
I love the part where she finally admits to Bojack and herself her lifelong dream of being an architect. Such a heartwarming scene. ☺️
I’m gonna guess Bojack Horseman. If I’m wrong I’m sure someone will jump in and correct me faster than a particularly quick fox.
You’re ~not~ wrong. Its Bojack Horseman.
Bojack Horseman.
Thanks! I’ve had that recommended to me by several people now so I’m gonna go ahead and watch it. 😆
That’s the whale from the show that was on the show with the horse from Horsin’ Around!
“Where did you hear this intriguing ‘fart it out theory?’” “I don’t remember, maybe The Bible?” “Thank you for clarifying.”
Definitely one of the best shows.
Ah to watch that show all over again would be bliss. Its a watch it drunk and sober type of show. It hit different when i was living the semi bojack lifr of drugs girls and alcohol when i was young, then watching when im older i just shake my head.
The whale, especially its ‘lip,’ is so perfect.
Just Horsin’ Around
What is this, a crossover episode?
Who wants to screech at me today for calling out butterfly for being a class divider?
This shit posting is losing you elections and strengthening fascism.
I’ll go spell it out because people missing the point can’t possibly find it otherwise: The criticism expressed by the image (which iirc is either a direct quote from the show or was originally about a very similar issue) is not about who is for or against abortions, it’s about who shapes public discourse for a variety of issues, which tends to have a clear bias. Which then shapes the opinion of everyone.
With abortion in particular it probably originates more in churches than tv panels, but churches aren’t exactly known for gender diversity in leaders.
30% of the congress are women.
Women votes for trump. 44 points. Roughly equal representation on health, education, etc in journalism.
But yeah keep on screeching men are the issue. It’s definitely working and not creating not pissed off men and little tate-er tots following him on yt.
The shitting on men will continue until men vote correctly. It’s like watching the US spend trillions bombing Afghanistan.
Just impossible to tear down hierarchy without shitting on half the population I guess.
Did you miss this part? Let me post it again for you just in case:
The criticism expressed by the image (which irc is either a direct quote from the show or was originally about a very similar issue) is not about who is for or against abortions, it’s about who shapes public discourse for a variety of issues, which tends to have a clear bias. Which then shapes the opinion of everyone.
What part of less than a median 6 point gap in representation on social issues in journalism are you not understanding?
The fact that it has nothing to do with the pundits they put on TV since they aren’t journalists, but rather think-tank political operatives?
🤣👌👍
A simple “I’m sorry, you’re right” would be appropriate.
But I guess that’s a bit too much introspection and skepticism, huh?
I’m the last person that will ever screech men are the issue because I hate nothing more than blanket generalizations. I do think the actual issue behind a lot of the sexism women face is male culture (depending on specific peers, of course, but common enough that I’ve seen it everywhere). Not quite toxic masculinity (though that’s part of it), but normalization of behaviour I would say is clearly wrong (most commonly some forms of sexual harrassment). There’s a disconnect there and I agree that saying “men are the issue” isn’t going to solve any of it.
But this image is still not saying “men are the issue”. I also think it’s hard to argue against it (or for it) with stats, since it’s about the dynamics of specific topics. Your gender or sex do not really change how much you are affected by idk general economic policy (effects of wage gap aside, but that’s its own issue and not inherent to anything). But for example abortion disproportionately affects women, so women should be overrepresented in related discussions. Similarly if you want to discuss, say, racial profiling, maybe you should actually include people that would be affected and not just the majority ethnicity.
And yes, in both those examples wealth is also a factor. But we can start with the things that are easier to control for - just in general trying to represent as much of society as possible, while focusing on the groups most affected by the particular issue.
Just to be clear why I downvoted. I wouldn’t want you to keep thinking you’re on the good side of things fighting the good fight. You are using anonymity to justify atrocious behavior and lack of understanding. You are the one implying the division when it’s possible there is none. A lot of the anti-“white men” you think you experience isn’t real.
👌👍
You’ve missed the point entirely.
And fascists don’t need a reason to act like assholes, they want an excuse.
Edit: wrong comment 😐
Youre the only one screeching here… But sure, we should all listen to the man obsessed with and stalking another lemmy user. That’s exactly what a normal, sane, and reasonable person would do.
👌👍🤣
