• Tolc@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yankees going to murder more women and children, like they always do

  • zd9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    298
    ·
    8 days ago

    They’re gonna go kill brown people to get the focus off of the richest ruling elite in the world (including their own commander in chief) trafficking, raping, and murdering children.

      • M137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Seriously? It’ll definitely work for more people than one dares to believe. It’s not about it working in the way you mean on us, the people that nothing will work on, it’s about everyone else. And for us that have functional empathy, conscience, intelligence etc. it will work in another way, we see the horrors about to happen. We see the people it’s going to happen to as actual people and anyone can only handle so much. It’s the classic “do or confess bad thing to make other bad thing seem less relevant”, and that works on everyone, just in different ways.
        I can absolutely see even here on lemmy being filled with news about this and less about what they’re doing this to take attention away from. It’ll work on me, no matter how much I don’t want it to, because I feel for the people who will suffer and die from this. And It’ll work on others in other ways.

      • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah, we’ve already firmly established that the majority of the US still doesn’t care about these countries. I doubt it’ll be more than a blip.

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          It’s not about white or brown. It’s easier for them to get support to abuse the brown people, it doesn’t mean white people are safe, or they won’t be working to hurt them. In fact everything they are doing is getting license to hurt white people en masse in the united states proper, while they steal elections, and throw protesters in camps, with courts unable to issue nationwide injunctions now.

          That said, the Iranians are basically white, without the head gear they would fit right in, Iran means Aryan by the way. From being settled by horse tribes from the steppes of Asia around 1,500 bc,

      • YTG123@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 days ago

        It was never about skin colour though, was it?

        disclaimer for people who don't like to interpret internet comments charitably

        (even if it was, that wouldn’t make racism acceptable ofc)

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          I love that disclaimer. I feel like I need to put it on everything. People seem quite incapable of separating descriptive and normative statements on here.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Sometimes I feel like people have misinterpreted all my social critiques as advocacy for the things I was critiquing.

            Like I’ll point something out, say “Society tends to do such-and-such,” implying, “and that’s wrong,” but what people hear instead is “as it should.”

            Like, I could explicitly state “and that’s wrong” all the time, but sometimes that would get a “no shit” reaction, or possibly come off as performative.

            Sometimes there’s just no winning…

            • tomiant@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Small minds, they are not used to braining. They think making a statement means promoting that thing. They think criticizing an argument automatically means you disagree with it.

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Both true statements.

                Social justice topics are particularly sticky to navigate, especially as someone who isn’t visibly a minority. Like if I say “[such-and-such] minorities aren’t oppressed,” they’ll say “how dare you say that, yes they are!” But if I say “[such-and-such] minorities are oppressed,” they’ll say “how dare you say that, that’s so patronizing!” And if I don’t say anything, they’ll say “how dare you remain silent about the plight of so many people!” Again, there’s no winning.

                They think criticizing an argument automatically means you disagree with it.

                Yeah, I’m far more likely to criticize an argument that I agree with in essence but disagree in substance or method. Like, if someone is completely wrong about something and has no inclination of being convinced otherwise, usually I won’t waste my time. I don’t argue with right-wingers online anymore because there’s no fucking point, I don’t have the time and energy for that, and I don’t even visit the same spaces of the internet as them. The most I’ll do when I see them in the wild is ridicule them and move on.

                If I see a leftist arguing poorly, however, I’ll usually chip in my ten cents as to how they could improve their argument. Whether the focus should be slightly different, or there’s a better way to argue the same thing, or the premises could be more factual, or the logic more structurally valid. If I disagree about the nuances of their argument, I’ll present a nuanced argument of my own.

                But some people seem to think that if I’m arguing with leftists, then I must be a right-winger. That’s incorrect. If I was a right-winger, I would be spending more time in right-wing spaces and less in leftist spaces. I wouldn’t bother arguing with people who’s perspectives and worldviews are so categorically different from my own. If I wasn’t a leftist, I wouldn’t care if leftists online could be making better arguments.

                Also, more and more these days I find myself treating tankies like I treat right-wingers. They’re equally as deluded, irrational, heavyhanded, and authoritarian. They don’t listen to reason or facts and evidence. It’s all ideology, propaganda, DARVO, gaslighting, insults, and accusations with them.

                But I do still argue with them, because they’re so pervasive in left-wing spaces, and I don’t want them dominating the narrative. I want other leftists, less extreme leftists, rational and empathetic leftists, to have spaces where they feel comfortable having intelligent discussions without it turning into a tankie circlejerk.

                Example:

                When I was still on reddit, a few years ago the democratic socialists sub was overrun with tankies. Like, they already had all the other leftist subs, couldn’t they just leave this one that’s supposed to be the least extreme and most inclusive of diverse opinions? So I started arguing with them about why authoritarian behavior shouldn’t be tolerated there, that it’s a democratic socialist sub and should be treated as such. It caught on, and other peoplw picked up the argument. Eventually the mods had a vote on whether to ban ML harassment. It passed, and now MLs are still allowed there, but if they attack people for disagreement then they get banned.

                But tankies don’t actually engage with my arguments in good faith, they just call me a fascist because I refuse to kowtow to their moral pedestal-standing and ideological purism. And in effect, they water down the meaning of the word ‘fascist’ and make it harder to be taken seriously when I point to actual examples of fascism.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        In the '20s, people considered Irish immigrants not to be white. It’s a meaningless label that people subjectively change the definition of just to other those they don’t like

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Irish people are like physically some of the whitest people in existence. All the Celts, Germanics are up there, very fair skin, starved of vitamin d for ages presumably they developed that skin to produce more when they did get sun.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’ve been saying that cutting USAID and the nearly million deaths that followed in the subsequent months as a direct result of cutting a program that as much as a couple of his planned ballrooms, should get him hanged slowly at the hague.

      Out of everything he’s done, this along with rolling back environmental protections will have caused the most harm and suffering to humanity and these are the things getting the least attention.

      Imagine having the power to ruin the lives of countless millions of living souls and doing it for no other reason than to prove how “not woke” you are and to add another several cents per share to your donor’s investments.

    • btsax@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Nixon and Reagan both conspired with hostile foreign governments to win elections and we let both of those guys off the hook. Why would this be different?

        • btsax@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          8 days ago

          I don’t see a whole lot of lesson-learning going on. Except by those who have been taught that when they break laws there isn’t punishment

          • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            The POLITICIANS don’t seem to have learned anything, at least the MAGA comedy act of Schmuck & Jeffries haven’t. They might as well be working for them.

            But the Citizens have. We know that the Dems have done nearly nothing to protect us from the MAGA scourge, and we are likely to have to do it ourselves.

            But some are awake, and others are waking. We may yet be able to force the Dems to do their jobs, and fight for us. How the Dems respond to the inevitable MAGA screaming when they get crushed in the Midterms will tell the tale. If Schmuck & Jeffries let them get away with stealing this election, too, like they did with 2024, them we’ll have to take matters into our own hands.

            And for their fecklessness, our elected Dems will find themselves nearly as big an enemy as MAGA.

      • j_elgato@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Different?

        Yeah. The ruling class, and the oligarchs who own them, have made it abundantly clear they will burn the whole system down rather than allow one of their own to be held accountable.

        See also: Biden 2020/AG Garland

        • btsax@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 days ago

          If we read of one man robbed, or murdered, or killed by accident, or one house burned, or one vessel wrecked, or one steamboat blown up, or one cow run over on the Western Railroad, or one mad dog killed, or one lot of grasshoppers in the winter, - we need never read of another. One is enough. If you are acquainted with the principle, what do you care for a myriad instances and applications?

          -Thoreau, Walden

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          They need the current system in place way more than we do. They benefit greatly by this system, we don’t. They may THREATEN to burn it down, but they won’t. They worked too hard, and they benefit too much by it, to let it go.

          Before they’ll destroy the system that has made them wealthy, and will continue to make them wealthy, they’ll surrender, and live to fight another day.

          They’ll kill MAGA before they’ll kill the THEIR economy.

          • j_elgato@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            They are using the dissolution of the USSR as their model.

            The current system transfers wealth upwards, but they will be happy to dismantle it if it means they can seize control of all the national infrastructure, resources, and the machinery of State directly and permanently.

    • ickplant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      8 days ago

      💯

      But instead it will probably get him more adoration from his base.

      Who am I kidding? It’s not probably, it’s definitely.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        For now, foreign wars are a slow burn on popularity, for now he will be popular, before too long people will hate him for it, he will be gone soon anyway though he already doesn’t know what is going on, or he wouldn’t be betraying his america first bullshit.

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 days ago

          And they’ll just latch on to the next toad creature that comes along, they always do, they won’t all suddenly un-fascist themselves.

          • hector@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 days ago

            Oh yeah, the party’s base is radicalized, and the establishment are all in on fascist dictatorship time. It’s just a matter of who wins the succession fight, and if they can hold it, and steal it if need be, with their new leader during the fight. Vance won’t get it, someone will take it from him.

            The project 2025 people, the religious right, their business dickheads, and their assorted partizans are all in on it, anyone with loyalty to country, and elections, over the party, has been purged after they gave themselves away in 2020, and none of them were purged, not in government and bureaucracy, after 2020 either because Biden let them all get away with it, so noble to let captured agencies fail in their statutory duties in the most basic of their missions, preventing the republic from being killed in all but name with elections fixed, but I digress.

            The only way out is popular reform by a strong opposition leader that organizes the opposition, and knows how to build and run a political machine, and we won’t seemingly have that, so Republicans get to carry on their shit show it appears.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Pedos or not there is no way the USA would stay out of waging new wars either way, it’s literally its bread and butter and can’t exist without it. The machine is getting itchy, it needs blood, that simple.

    • arcine@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Oh he’s way past that point already. Even the most horrible of public executions would not be punishment enough.

      Let him burn in hell forever, if hell indeed exists.

  • zewm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 days ago

    Okay. And for those of us that haven’t served what does it mean? Fucking gate keepers, man.

    • Bazell@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      161
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Such good food is served to boost morale and mood of soldiers before the battle. In this case, before a new war. To be more precise: before war between the USA and Iran(and Israel as an ally).

    • ickplant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      War is coming tomorrow.

      Edit: again, I would like to add that this is wild speculation.

      • U7826391786239@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        8 days ago

        i will honestly be surprised if it happens this far out from the midterms. i was thinking shit hits the fan maybe a month or two at most before voting day, so fascists can pep rally their braindead supporters into a “we are victorious, therefore the best party” bullshit narrative

        i could be wrong. it doesn’t matter. trump was always going to invade iran, regardless of how fucking dumb that always was

          • someguy3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            People didn’t even show up for their own human rights, they won’t show up because of Iran. Trump will just bomb them to hell and leave it a mess, so no boots on the ground imagery.

            • arrow74@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Oh yeah if he didn’t put any boots on the ground that’s different. The American people have a record of being just fine boning anywhere and anything

              • someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                He’s going to try the same thing as Venezuala, put in some sort of goverment that answers to him. It will be harder though.

                He’s all about imagery. He knows boots on the ground getting blown up is bad imagery, so he’ll leave it to who the fuck knows to sort out the mess. Apparently the son of the Shah lives in the US.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            They may genuinely think that electoral politics won’t impact them, or that they have it compromised enough or that enough people will actually support them.

            They’ve been overreaching from the start and they’re going to reap the consequences. A lot of people on the right and left alike right now are waving their hands at electoralism broadly thinking it doesn’t do anything, when it’s why we’re here at all so there is a large amount of ignorance spread through the country. This could be good news for our elections, it could be terrible news for our world broadly as these chucklefucks start wars and trample over the world.

          • U7826391786239@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 days ago

            Truthfully I think a new war now would destroy them

            why do you think that? tell the public that X is a threat to america, so therefore we need to invade/obliterate X-- done, mission accomplished. see: bush 2

            If they let midterms happen

            this is key. trump will put pressure on state governors and state boards of elections to throw away all the D votes, because that’s what he fucking does. and even if that fails, it seems to me that he gets whatever the fuck he wants anyway.

            so again: doesn’t matter. i hope you don’t have kids

            • arrow74@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              why do you think that? tell the public that X is a threat to america, so therefore we need to invade/obliterate X-- done, mission accomplished. see: bush 2

              You are forgetting 2 very big reasons why Bush was able to start that war

                • arrow74@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Sure, but let me get ahead of what you’re going to say. 9/11 provided the justification. As of right now, we have not had another 9/11 like event to justify invading another country. Citing a vague threat used to work immediately after 9/11, but that faded after about a decade. All you have to do is look at public opinion of the war in Afghanistan. The vague "threats’ of danger stopped working.

                  Of course as with all horrible things about 30% of the dumbest demographic will support it no matter what.

              • Mirshe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 days ago

                Not really doomerism when we literally had the DHS secretary on mic in public say “we’re going to have ICE making sure the right people vote for the right leaders”.

                When the enemy tells you their plan, believe them the first time.

              • hector@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                Not a fucking chance that happens. We could assassinate a string of their leaders, they won’t let a puppet take over, not a fucking chance. If anything hardliners will get in after they kill their leaders, which is what Israel wants, to keep the war going, for cause to come back and hit them again and again after peace is remade, for years. It’s a forever war Israel is buying with their blackmail so they don’t have to face their domestic failures in the ghetto uprising, and elections.

              • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                They cut and ran in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and that was when the U.S. was a global hegemon at its absolute peak. No way they can regime change a country that is more populous and developed than both neighbors put together.

                Especially not after they have spend the last 9 years destroying their international power structures.

                I mean, sure, they kan kill a few hundred thousand people, declare victory and fuck off, but they can’t do much to actually change anything for the better long term.

          • hector@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            You do realize most of that is a concerted effort to drum up support, that the protests aren’t nearly as widespread as they would have you believe, and that this is 101 for manipulating people into war?

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Idk, it will spike gas prices presumably, one thinks Iran would shut down the straits of hormuz this time, I can’t believe they didn’t last time though so what do I know. But it will supercharge inflation, and gas prices, 25% of oil moves through there.

          Plus once a ship gets blown up, insurance pulls their coverage, and those tankers are worth like a hundred million or more, they won’t risk them in a war zone without insurance.

          One would think between mines, and missiles they could have dug in and pull out and shoot off then disappear, that they could shut down the straits, and that maybe last time they were holding back to wait it out and not escalating. Which was a mistake as it guarenteed Israel would want to get some more cost free hits in.

          But close to the election the hyper inflation could hurt, now they’ve plenty of time to calm it down, assuming they can keep Israel on a leash enough to keep the gulf ships going through after.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            You think Iran could control the Strait of Hormuz against two US carrier strike groups?

            • hector@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              I think they could with mines, and missiles, and drones, be able to hit oil tankers well enough to shut down the straits of hormuz.

              You don’t think so? I thought they were going to do it last time and they didn’t, so maybe I was mistaken.

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                There are certain things people can reasonably criticize the US military as being bad at, but I don’t think anyone can credibly claim it isn’t excellent at achieving air superiority. I mean, maybe it could turn out that the Navy is “fighting the last war” and unprepared for drones, but I don’t think that’s likely. Especially not against Iran (China I might give more credit to, what with their hypersonic missiles and all).

                • hector@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  I am not saying Iran would beat the US navy, just that it should be able to threaten cargo ships enough to shut down the strait of hormuz and thereabouts. Between mines, floating things that explode when something hits them, sometimes set to intermediate depths. That could be dropped by drones or missiles. To missiles and drones themselves, they should be able to shut down the trade, once there is a credible threat insurance should pull their coverage even if the navy is escorting them.

                  That is their only real card to play here. Well besides for taking out Saudi oil facilities, which is not a bad idea at all. No matter what the saudis say now that Iran showed they can hit them, the Saudis were the biggest proponents of war with Iran back in the president’s first term. They deserve it, and they are more vulnerable, as the US doesn’t protect them so much.

                  Besides for that, yeah maybe big maybe they could take out a ship, if they got lucky and overwhelmed their defenses?

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        8 days ago

        I just looked up the original tweet. It was sent out on Friday. (20 Feb 2026)

        The Pentagon Pizza index shows a weeklong 160% spike in afternoon activity at the Papa Johns 2.3 miles from the Pentagon.

        The 5 closer pizza places are currently showing a bit busy, but nothing outside of the ordinary.

    • Mannimarco@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s like in games when there is suddenly a room with lots of healing items and ammo you know there is a hard fight coming up

    • Doom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      8 days ago

      You know how they feed a death row inmate a last meal before sending them off to die. Kinda like that, only more fucked up because our troops are going to die for the machinations of billionaires and warlords.

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        The US won’t be suffering that many casualties. Iran is powerless to respond to most of these aerial attacks and guided missiles and advanced drones. That’s why they are doing it, well that’s why Israel is using their epstein blackmail to get the US to do it for them. Then Israel can always find another pretext to bomb and assassinate them even after peace is declared. Forever war, a permanent foil for Israel, their bogeyman their media has crafted, despite their lack of advanced weapons systems.

    • GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 days ago

      The military isn’t well known for their cuisine. The exception is when they’re about to deliver some bad news. Steak and lobster means you’re about to get shipped off to war.

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Or Christmas dinner.

        Every time unscheduled good food showed up, shitty orders followed.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      I didn’t serve and know well that this is a bad omen. When the military gives unprompted moral-boosting rewards, it means they’re buying something.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Oh they meant served as in military service. Given the context, I read it as anyone who has been a server/waiter and served food.

    • crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      It means that it’s steak and crab legs day in the meal rotation. Or that anyone outside the immediate chain of command is visiting for any reason.

      In other words, it means nothing.

    • groupofcrows@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I had to check the date. It’s been 4 years since the end of the Beijing winter Olympic, also known as the start of Russia’s 3 day special military operation.

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s also a few days into Ramadan, a holiday where Muslims fast while the sun is up. (It lasts approximately from fat Tuesday to Easter.)
      So, you know, if you want to fuck up someone’s day, make ‘em work extra hard while hangry.

      (Which is not necessarily true. IIRC, much of the religious understanding and forgiveness in Islam is about intent. They might be cool with breaking a fast when facing an existential threat. But it’s Iran, sooo…)

    • sahin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      People are doing it for money, that is why it is so important to help the poor. When people are poor, they can do whatever a rich guy says

      • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I agree that it’s important to help the poor to make them less susceptible to financial coercion. After all, that is what capitalism does to quantitive measurements of debt, turns it from debt forgiveness to debt peonage. The second part isn’t necessarily true, there are plenty of poor people that don’t do what rich people tell them to, and plenty of rich people who happily do what rich people tell them to do.

      • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I agree that it’s important to help the poor to make them less susceptible to financial coercion. After all, that is what capitalism does to quantitive measurements of debt, turns it from debt forgiveness to debt peonage. The second part isn’t necessarily true, there are plenty of poor people that don’t do what rich people tell them to, and plenty of rich people who happily do what rich people tell them to do.

    • Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      You forgot oil . Those executives cant get that 5th yacht unless innocent desert children die

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      8 days ago

      A pedophile wants to create a distraction so he asks his genocidal friend how he does it so they start a war together. Imagine dying so a pedophile doesn’t have to face justice. MAGA: they’ll do it.