• DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Google’s sideloading restrictions seems almost like its perfectly timed… 👀

    Anyways, Google can gargle my:

    • qualia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      How to choose between this and GrapheneOS, CalyxOS, etc? I feel ready for the switch too.

      Edit: Plus is it possible to get banking apps and Google Wallet to still work (easily) in these Android-based alternatives?

      • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Mostly: Price

        Are you willing to, either: (a) spend $500-$600 for a new Google Pixel? (the 9 that is, I don’t think 10 is ready for GrapheneOS yet), or (b) willing to dig into the second hand market and potentially get not-unlockable phones? (those run rampant in the used market, note that Carrier Unlock does not equate to Bootloader Unlock, and Verizon ones are guaranteed to not allow bootloader unlocking, I’m unsure about other carriers)

        (Also you are kinda supporting google if you get a new one btw.)

        I personally don’t wanna spend $500 since if it ever breaks, its hard to replace or even repair. And I hate dealing with the used market.

        So for me, Graphene isn’t an option.

        I went for the cheapest new Moto that has custom ROM support, Moto G 5G 2024 for $140 (carrier variants do not unlock).

        I’m basically still testing to see what wouldn’t work, haven’t really be using it as a “daily driver”

        I’ve also come across the CMF Phone 1 which is OLED and supports e/OS its about $300

        TLDR: Get Graphene if you can afford a pixel or willing to look for a used phone from a reputable source. I personally do not like used phones because I think there’s too much risks IMO, you might assess the risks differently. Other options are Moto G 5G 2024 for $140 which runs both LineageOS and e/OS, or CMF (by Nothing) Phone 1 which runs e/OS and is an overall much better phone, but its more expensive, at $250 for 128 GB and $300 for the 256 GB.

        Oh one last thing: Even “New” “Unlocked” cheap Pixels on sites like Amazon aren’t guaranteed to unlock. I was looking at older pixels like the 6a, 7, 7a and checked the reviews and some comments indicate they are locked to Verizon because the reseller didn’t unlock it for some reason, so I’m get the vibes that its unsold stock previously owned by carriers, so I don’t know if they’ll bootloader unlock, even if its SIM unlocked. Where as CMF never has carrier variants, so they all should unlock.

        Edit: Also, the CMF phone needs the IMEI added in to carriers such as ATT and Verizon, since they use IMEI whitelisting, Tmobile is fine. For some countries like, Australia they also does nationwide whitelisting. Custom ROMs can break VoLTE, rendering it not work with cell service for csrriers that require VoLTE, Might wanna research about that.

        • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          In Australia it’s a blocklist, not an allowlist. I think some VoLTE-capable devices may have been swept up in the blocking that occurred with the ending of 3G services, that you can manually have allowed, but it depends on carrier and device. Most though are fine.

    • vandsjov@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      That is just so sad that it’s the way you have to do business. Constant praising and sucking up.

  • DarthAstrius@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    I get the outrage, I really do, but the app broke many privacy rights for users and also the app did technically break ToS by definition being a “doxxing” app.

    Regardless, there are websites out there that do it far better than the app, and have universal access Apple and Android devices, which makes sense, because the developer of ICEBlock made it exclusive to Apple, and hispanic communities are overwhelmingly Android users.

  • JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Was this ever even available to non-US accounts? Was there ever an explanation for why it was georestricted?

    • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s an app about ICE, why would it be available to non-US accounts? It was pawbably georestricted by the developer, just like most apps that have a geoblock.

        • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Define from the US. Are you saying those travelling in from internationally by air or road, that are getting stopped and generally detained by CBP, where ICE reporting apps would be useless because they aren’t making it to the broader community? Or are you saying those who are living and working in the US and pawbably have a US Apple account?

          • JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            People living in the US but using an Apple account set to another country. Because you can only switch it once a year or something inconvenient like that. Whatever the circumstances may be, there is seemingly no good reason to restrict the app to US accounts only.

  • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    695
    ·
    8 days ago

    And this is why having 3rd party app stores is important. It’s why it matters that Google is killing side loading, if two fucking companies get to decide what you can do on your phone, we’re in a bad spot technology wise

      • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        71
        ·
        8 days ago

        No doubt. I’ve gotten to the point where I have like 6 apps on my phone and it’s in lockdown mode on iOS. And I’d be on grapheneOS if I wasn’t required to use iOS for work.

        • jqubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          65
          ·
          8 days ago

          Can you have your job pay for an iPhone while you have a different personal phone? I’m a big fan of keeping a work device that’s separate from a personal device.

          • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            58
            ·
            8 days ago

            I probably could, but I’m also a recovering drug addict and my partner is pretty hesitant about a second device as it’s another way to hide things. However I’m the head of the MDM team so I’m not really nervous about what the company can see

            • fascicle@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              52
              ·
              8 days ago

              I thought you were head of the MDMA team for a second and thought that could be rough as a recovering drug addict

                • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  22
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Oddly I’ve only tried MDMA a few times and it never really worked. There’s some anecdotal evidence that it doesn’t work for those with bipolar which I do have, that might be the one drug I could be in charge of with no temptation actually

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        65
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        And the open source movement is such a blind spot to the ‘left’ as well, even though technology freedom is critical if you want to be able to organise any type of resistance in the digital space.

        Lemmy users largely get it, obviously, but centre left people will happily let themselves get locked into the Apple/Google walled gardens even though you’re just giving that company a ridiculous amount of power over you.

        • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          48
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Right? The collective dismissal of Mastodon from leftist influencers when the Muskening happened was eye opening.

          Like, there’s a collaborative, volunteer-based platform right over there. You want mutual aid? Open-source is as mutual-aid as it gets.

          But it’s nerd shit.

          • SOULFLY98@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 days ago

            Because they are controlled opposition.

            The only time something not controlled got popular was TikTok and you saw how quickly both parties went to ban it in 2024 after normal people started talking about Gaza genocide in every day conversation. The American Congress worked together to ban it even though they couldn’t agree on anything else.

            It went from an Asian platform where Asian people in the West connected with each other outside the mainstream blue pill/red pill false choice and shared culture as well as history that isn’t taught, to “here’s the truth about Jesus” and “the world is flat debate me” after that vote. Now it’s full on MAGA.

            Mastodon is harder to control because servers can pop up organically, but I guess Threads was a hedge against that threat.

            • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              The only time something not controlled got popular was TikTok

              I’m not sure what you mean by controlled, but how I got to know it was as the malware that’s recommended to everyone on the front page of the google play store, and then even factory preinstalled on a lot of them.

              • SOULFLY98@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                It wasn’t doing anything that Facebook wasn’t already doing, but it got banned. The CEO was brought in front of Congress and racially profiled, gave strong answers, and then got banned anyway.

                Wonder why?

                TikTok hate was a bot farm. The algorithm was always a reflection of the user.

          • shrugs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            8 days ago

            Also, on xitter are all these assholes I don’t care about. I can’t leave that platform. Pathetic!

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah it’s unhinged, FOSS is as communism in practice as it gets right now and the left just ignores it, dismissing it as “tech bad” because they can only think in AnPrim brainrot terms most of the time and judge only by aesthetics and make sweeping generalisations about social media that lack any and all imagination.

        • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 days ago

          I originally got introduced to sociallist idiology through Richard Stallman’s speaches. I know he had some, uhh… “interesting” things to say about Epstein’s victims (which I believe he has since redacted), but his speaches are absolutely still worth listening to just for the content alone.

        • shrugs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          People will never understand intricacies like that. On the other hand, the big tech corps do. We are doomed

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah. And to think, it’s a fairly small amount of nuance - it’s very basic and intuitive and information about it is literally everywhere. We are hopeless when it comes to far more complex and nuanced social issues we face like rehabilitation or ethnocentrism or trans athletes or the what have you.

            People seem to think socialism and any progress is like “be nice to each other” or some stupid aestheticism about “empathy”.

            There’s basically no way to have a conversation with them most of the time, they are so far gone and their fully formed thoughts seem more like inaccurate shorthands, it’s like trying to explain astrodynamics to a dog when it’s actively trying not to understand them.

            Normies are the death of us all.

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        We rapidly need to switch to Linux Mobile. PostmarketOS and Mobian are the two most promising projects, and I would highly recommend anyone reading this to donate to them if you have the means.

        Both projects directly use your donations to hire developers to build and polish the critical essentials to get this alternative viable as a daily driver.

        • ISOmorph@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 days ago

          While I full heartily agree with you, I’m pessimistic you will ever reach enough people with these alternatives. Even on privacy forums you hear people fervently defending how banking apps are mandatory. Those will never run on anything that isn’t locked down. The eID proposal for the EU is also dependent on Android and iOS.

          • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            8 days ago

            It doesn’t necessarily need to achieve mass adoption, it just needs to get to a ‘good enough’ point to make it viable for those who are willing or desperate to get away from big tech.

            Linux still has plenty of people giving reasons why they won’t switch, but it’s now finally viable for many, including myself. I just want mobile Linux to get to that point too, even if there’s still rough edges.

          • 0x0@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            how banking apps are mandatory.

            This i don’t get, i’d rather use home-banking from my home PC.

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              7 days ago

              A lot of banks require their personal apps as 2FA to access your account. I would never agree to that.

              • sadfitzy@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                I don’t need to use an app to manage my bank account.

                Sounds like you people have shitty banks. Maybe it’s time to switch?

                • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  I am not American you weird internet man. In the rest of the world and specifically my part of it - Europe, all banks require their app, there is no way around it, and there is no way to use foreign bank accounts or not have a bank account at all etc etc.

                  I wrote about all this before, including ITT.

                  Why the fuck do I have to explain this over and over like you was born yesterday?

                  Stop assuming your country’s experience is at all representative of the rest of the world, because evidently - it is not.

                • Ofiuco@piefed.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Sure, come to México and tell me which local bank allows me to not use an app at all and I’ll switch

              • Ofiuco@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                I love how you are getting downvoted for getting frustrated with people who can’t see beyond their own nose.

                I fully agree with you, these people just don’t want to admit some of us don’t have the privilege of choosing since all the options end up on forcing a banking app one way or another.
                Because it is a fucking privilege at this point.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah, people should have listened to the people warning of privacy concerns with online services. Now that your data is valuable, companies will do anything to extract it from you.

        Stop using those products, de-Google, install Linux, use self-hosted solutions.

        It will take some effort to switch. You get to decide how much effort you’re willing to expend in order to not sacrifice all of your privacy and control of your digital lives.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          Oh yeah, of course, but it feels like it’s never part of the conversation, even among people whose opinions I respect and are, for example, super critical of AI and talking about enshittification and other issues in the online sphere, they never seem to take the step to check out Linux, or get off Twitter or whatever.

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      142
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      “Sideloading” is their term, invented to make it sound like something it is not. We should not use this word. The correct word is “installing”.

      You don’t “sideload” on Windows when you install software outside of the Microsoft Store™️. There is no real difference or distinction with software on phones, so there is no need for a special word.

      • Pieplup@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Windows laready has something like this it’s called S mode i think. IT makes it so you can only instlal stuff frmo the windows store, but you can disable it pretty easily.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        8 days ago

        I can see Microsoft moving to the same sort of thinking as well. Apple already made Mac OS users jump through hoops when you want to install something from the internet or even through a third party package manager like homebrew.

      • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Not to defend it, but the first time I encountered the term was when BlackBerry released their Playbook tablet. It ran their bbos10 and they created an android emulator so you could run some android apps. The process of installing the apk into the emulator was called sideloading.

        I miss BlackBerry is all I really wanted to say.

      • B-TR3E@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        “Install” includes installing from an app store no matter how closed down and exlusive. The correct term would be “install from other sources than an app store” which is just clunky. Calling it “sideloading” won’t change that nor will calling it “your mom”. Considering how many corporate-speak terms are in use and how many braindead abbreviations and terms shortened to a word’s last syllable -completely distorting the original meaning- generally are in use, the term “sideloading” is pretty irrelevant. Either lose your mind listening to the bullshit people permanently are emitting or just live with it…

        • 0x0@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          the term “sideloading” is pretty irrelevant.

          No, it’s not.
          “Installing” is innocuous and easily understandable (by those tech-illiterate dumbfucks that get spoonfed FUD by lobbyists); whereas sideloading is eerily similar to sidestepping and is prone to being interpreted as “working around a safeguard”.

          Words are not irrelevant.

          • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            Right? Anyone who has been paying attention to the healthcare thing in america should know that what you call something influences immensely what people think about something. Just look at the difference in support in polling when they call it the affordable healthcare act OR obamacare.

            • Pieplup@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              Right, we should just completely ignore any power words have over people, because we personally don’t like it. Let’s also ignore all sorts of other manipulation tactics cause it’s more convinet to pretend they don’t exist. 🙄

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      If people were more aware of how to make and install mobile web apps it would be less of a problem.

      At least on the iPhone you can still add a site to your screen that can behave a lot like an app, including camera access, location services, and even gyro. And it’s just a website like most “apps” are.

    • kender242@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      “Hurd OS? Isn’t that obsolete?” “Not obsolete. Just… illegal.” ~Rainbows End by Vernor Vinge

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      Honestly, this thing should just been a PWA. Making this naive app was dumb.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Google is not killing sideloading. If the dev is willing to submit to Apple for verification, they’d probably not object to submitting it to Google.

      E: downvotes for facts, I guess? 🤷

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yes, and then they ban that developer and their apps. It doesn’t matter you can install apps outside of the Play Store, if Google still controls which apps you are allowed to install.

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        Google is not killing sideloading. If the dev is willing to submit

        I see…

    • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      8 days ago

      I mean yeah honestly probably the best, but I’ll take any chance to rant against the idea of walled garden tech

    • ohellidk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 days ago

      Would I be paranoid to use a VPN while visiting this site? (And others like it) god only knows if IP’s visiting the site could be uncovered…

      Yeah, I’m probably being paranoid…

      • jontree255@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Not a bad idea. Just make sure your VPN doesn’t cooperate with law enforcement or sell your data otherwise.

        • Novaling@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          Additional note: check if the VPN does DNS or not. If not then use something like NextDNS, or get a VPN (Proton, Mullvad) that does do DNS servers. Plus they usually include better ad-blocking.

  • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    I don’t understand why society accepted that the hardware maker gets to decide what software you run.

    That’d be like your car deciding which roads you can take, or your blender deciding you’re not allowed to use strawberries in your smoothie.

    Are you nuts? Why the fuck would your phone decide which apps you can run?

    • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s the key difference between mobile devices and actual computers. You are merely a user, not the administrator who can do anything with the hardware.

      • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        8 days ago

        Apple welding their phones to their own store, exclusively, is just like paying workers with scrip instead of dollars. This used to be a common practice for capitalists. The scrip is spendable only in the company store.

        We have to stop all such anticompetitive practices.

        Just a reminder, to stop the practice of getting paid in scrip the American workers had to take up arms and shoot some people. Look up Battle of Blair Mountain. It’s not like the capitalists stopped the practice just because it was unpopular, lol. Nor did the anticompetitive practice of paying wages in scrip stop because people called their senators and wrote angry letters.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 days ago

        Is it that non tech people have a hard time understanding this? Or is it just all the corporate lobbying bribes?

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      That’d be like your car deciding which roads you can take,

      It’s a feature for the next release, don’t worry.

    • sadfitzy@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      The scumbags got a headstart on setting the standard for phone users so the freedom that was given to PC users never happens again.

      It worked and everyone with an iphone is an actual moron.

  • Luffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Does anyone remember how the Devs from there didnt want to release for Android because ApPlE iS sOoOo mUcH mOoOrE sEcUrE

    Get rekt.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Good thing I got revenge though on Google’s sideloading ban by buying a phone that never allowed it to begin with”

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      We should make webapps for everything. When done properly they are as fast as native apps, can work on any device and do not require a dev license or account.

    • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      there are technically alternative marketplaces on iOS in the EU, but they do the exact thing google is now copying off apple: apple still has to give the green light. apple “notarizes” every app, even if it goes through a third party app store. this changes the app irreversibly, and ios/ipados devices can only install notarized apps.

    • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, but are Apple users going to punish Apple for glazing Trump’s tiny manhood by not buying Apple products?

      Tim Apple certainly doesn’t think so.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I mean I’m doing my best to only buy second hand iPhones and replace them 5-10 years. The power of Apple is the reoccurring revenues of software and the new phone buyers

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s really not that bad a compromise, as far as bribes go. Some cheap gaudy bauble as payment for not interfering with billions of dollars in business?

        It’s still a bribe and it’s still encouraging mango mussolini, but very efficient tradeoff

    • __hetz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I remember him being gifted a golden pager and I’m still holding out hope that he gets the call.

  • Salvo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m gonna play devils advocate here (and probably be monstrously downvoted);

    ICEBlock stored the location data of all its users on Apples iCloud Servers. This the perfect target for ICE; a complete database of locations of every person who doesn’t want ICE to know where they are.

    One assumption is that that Apple realised how tempting this data is to the current demonstrative administration and purged it before ICE could get their civil-liberty-abusing mitts on it.

      • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        You’re absolutely right. Economic motivations decide the trajectory a company may take. Ethics, green washing, queer rights and other factors take a back seat. If they come with financial benefits, the company will follow that path, but that’s always because of money—no matter what the marketing material actually says.

        Remember when companies were supporting sexual and gender minorities? That was because financial incentives aligned with that at the time. Remember when those turncoats suddenly scrapped the DEI programs and removed all rainbow themes? Same motivation again. Facade changed, but the foundation is still the same.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Alternate take: Tim is a businessman doing what’s best for Apple and he personally might not support Trump, but we will likely never know.

        • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          7 days ago

          Tim Apple is a billionaire, doing billionaire things. Supporting the people who give him the most power and not giving a fuck about anyone else.

        • ErmahgherdDavid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Same take my friend. I agree - Tim’s personal politics are kinda irrelevant in this context. Best for apple=compliance with whoever is in charge so they get to keep their money printer. Corpos gonna corpo

        • fodor@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          Oh, so you’re trying to say that Tim is so greedy that he doesn’t have values at all, other than his greed? That’s an interesting position, but I think it makes him sound even worse than the previous one.

          • Pieplup@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            If he does he doesn’t have morals to care about acting on his values as such they are more or less irrelevant.

          • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            8 days ago

            It’s an inherent byproduct of capitalism.

            If you rise to Tim Cook’s level you must be someone that is either willing to put your personal values aside or you do not have them to begin with. The growth of the company matters more and if you prioritize your values you will be filtered the moment you misalign with whatever prevents maximal growth.

            Capitalism does not care about values, ethics, morals, social wellness, or anything besides growth. It is cancerous and leads to a toxic society that poisons itself and falls apart, which is literally happening

          • REDACTED@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            You don’t succesfully run big corporations by having high moral standarts, this was never an argument. Argument was about what makes businessman a good business man, and one major thing is seizing opportunities and “playing” important people like Trump. I don’t think he’s anywhere as (morally) bad as Steve Jobs was, but he’s doing his job as expected.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Something worth noting, if you are using iCloud, advanced data protection is your friend. Apple doesn’t have the encryption keys, you do.

      This is not on by default.

      • Salvo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        Advanced Data Protection does require all iCloud Ecosystem devices to be current.

        Not every person can afford the latest and greatest.

        • Jesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          It requires iOS 16 and MacOS 13.

          The devices that max out at those operating systems are 9 and 10 year old.

        • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Current or on a current OS?

          Edit: I just enabled it and I have a iPhone 11 on my iCloud account.

          So, just latest OS.

          Which Apple gives you basically forever instead of maybe a year of old updates with android.

    • brem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      Money is always the answer with these “people”.

      To assume otherwise is to feed the beast

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Disclaimer: The app is closed source, so all we can go off is the developer’s word, although the fact the government removed it is a strong indicator they don’t have access to data from the app

      The developer stated they do not even retain any identifying data, so the only data the government could get is public anyway. Through Apple they’d be able to see who downloaded it, and likely when it was used. Your defense would be easy enough though: “I just wanted to make sure the libs weren’t harassing our fascist patriotic ICE agents near me”

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        It is impossible to send a (edit: true) push notification to a device without knowing which device it is going to. The developer may not know/have access to that information, but Apple/Google know which devices they are sending those pushes to. If it wasn’t a true push notification, then they would not arrive in a timely manner and potentially only when the app was opened the next time.

        He was using true push notifications, so the government could just subpoena that information.

        He could maybe obfuscate who initiated the initial message, but its impossible to do that for the receivers.

  • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s really sickening that every corporation has thrown in with the new fascist regime.

    At least these assholes used to pretend to be “not absolutely awful”. Now they’re just mask-off oppressors.