Nobody here is advocating for banning porn or even restricting anyone’s access to it. I’ve never met a single person struggling with what I call porn addiction - whether it clinically qualifies as addiction or not - who wants to restrict other people’s access to it.

There doesn’t need to be any ideology attached to one’s personal desire to quit or cut back on their porn consumption.

Your justifications for these views fall quite deep into the conspiracy land.

Wanting to quit / cut back on porn is not synonymous with being anti-porn and “hypersexuality” is not an official medical diagnosis neither.

I think they’re pretty effective. Have you ever tried to masturbate with corn flakes and graham crackers? It’s rough.

“NoFap” doesn’t really refer to any masturbation addiction program as much as it refers to a specific community on Reddit that very much is pseudoscientific and the mods have promoted right wing candidates.

The benefits are all either “I personally have self esteem issues from masturbating, likely due to religious norms” or “I’m overthinking the concept of a refractory period.”

You could argue that the stigma on Masturbation fuels the self esteem etc problems and the improvement once people address it.

If it works for some, great!

Btw not saying there isn’t a lot of rotten stuff about the porn industry, sexy-economics and stuff. Still, just gaving a good wank is great.

Pretty sure you can comfortably argue the whole thing. No doubt there are benefits both sides depending on the individual and their circumstances, but I have never heard anyone outside internet even mention “nofap” or equivalents. I know zero people who would’ve even just mentioned it. So anyone I have ever known would also have these “wild takes”. Pretty sure none of them are in lemmy, and it’s not much wider a set if I include those that realistically could be but I just don’t know. So I’ve only ever seen your take in memes about incels and now, in lemmy, right here.

deleted by creator

Right. It’s called using AI. Not letting your vibes make decisions. Glad you agree.

Sounds like Linus needs to pivot to make his own Claude clone…

Hey ChatGPT, respond to all of my inquiries like my toxic abusive uncle. The more vicious the response the better. Withhold praise. Pretend it’s opposite day and give me your best compliments in the form of the life-long truama that I have come to associate with authority figures.

Here’s my code. What do you think?

I figured out a way to do this, via Alpaca.

In Alpaca you can set an LLM with a persistent prompt.

Basically, I just told the thing hey, you’re too sycophantic, often needlessly verbose, and often overly confident… can you generate a prompt for yourself to address those issues?

Roughly 30 minutes of trial and error along those lines later, now its quite matter of fact, and is at least more likely to tell me when it is aware it is making an assumption, and ask me for clarification or if i can give it more context, and it doesn’t do the kind of weird, intro and outro paragraphs where it basically just reassures you that your ideas are wonderful and you are valid and i just think the things you say are so interesting!

Then, you feed it a script, ask it do a sanity check, and it will generally go through and identify strenghts and weakness of the code, at least as it perceives such.

Beyond that, Alpaca recently introduced a … character system, that is ostensibly tailored toward making specific kinds of conversational chat bots… but it also introduced a kind of ‘dictionary’ system, where you can give it a kind of additional permanent reference knowledge, to associate with certain terms.

I have not tried this yet, but, I’d be willing to be that you could say, jam that with a bunch of examples of syntax and methods from a particular language or library… and my guess would be that you could thus tailor a ‘character’ that is more up to date or specific to some domain.

So… you could give it the main prompt of something like “You are a tsuntsun senior programmer who has nothing but contempt for any coding mistakes, and you pride yourself on coming up with entirely novel insults for each inadequacy you notice.”

… And then give it a ‘dictionary’ that pertains to syntax, methods, perhaps even broader concepts…

And that might actually produce your desired vicious asshole senior programmer persona.

Of course, this is not going to work for like, an entire massive codebase, unless you’re the one stockpiling all my the RAM.

But for smaller projects or just single scripts… it might kind of work.

You can give it rules.

I work with Gemini a lot and I told it to cut all the polite crap out and just give the facts I need.

I don’t think it will ever cuss at you, but your can have it be more critical. It say to me all the time, “this or probably a bad idea, before I do this, consider this alternative” (paraphrasing)

I don’t see votes. And I assume you agree with everything that is upvoted like a good little slave?

Hmm. Might need a bird addiction app.

Come to NZ and see a titipounamu, morepork, kaka

I suppose an appropriately trained parrot might do.

I mean if you pay a creator directly I don’t see how that could be unethical

Plenty of actresses and cam girls - particularly those working overseas - are managed directly by pimps or by agencies that function no differently. Plenty more are exploited indirectly in the same way Uber and Lyft exploit their drivers - treated as contract labor, underpaid, and subjected to abuse both off and on camera.

The system is fucked but people still need to eat

Sure. “No ethical consumption under capitalism”, yadda yadda.

And there’s plenty of arguments for why direct sourcing has better broad economic incentives. But Hugh Hiefner played this game with Playboy sixty years ago, insisting everyone was paid well and treated respectfully. And that was the softest of soft core. Turns out his organization was barely a step above the guys making porn videos for Times Square.

You make the best decisions you can. But at some point you have to recognize that you’re buying a narrative as much as anything.

It’s exceedingly rare for anyone to acknowledge their error online these days - and for that you have my respect.

Sad but true.

I disagree, but that’s fine. There are people that squeeze porn into every open minute of their lives, sacrifice relationship is because of it, and spend more than they have to view it. If that’s not addiction, then we might as well say that any non-chemical vice can’t be considered one, like gambling.

Just because many people don’t seem to notice their addiction that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. The methodology used to disprove the existence of porn addiction is just to completely and utterly ignore all the people who experience it and than claiming it doesn’t exist

So say we all.