(TikTok screencap)

  • abcdqfr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    But but they’re so nice to sleep under when you’re homeless or on a road trip and allergic to expending capital on motels… Just me?

  • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    There’s one of these in a shopping center around me. I flip it off every time I see it.

    I mean, I deliberately drive near it, stop, roll down my window, put my arm out, and flip it off very intentionally.

    I don’t care if it knows me. I’ve made no secret of my hatred for authoritarianism throughout my life. I’ve gone to more protests than I can count. Besides, if authorities really wanted to do something to me, they’d readily make things up anyway. They don’t need an excuse, so I might as well express myself.

    This shit is dystopian as fuck and every time I see it or it blasts out its message about us being watched, it boils my blood.

    Fuck it all. This is not okay.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      . . .flip it off very intentionally.

      Heehee I’m kinda glad I’m not alone here. I walk my neighborhood and people install those STUPID cameras facing the sidewalk to catch EVERYONE walking by, that whistle at you, or say “you are being recorded!”

      I give it the finger without looking at it basically as a reflex now. I’ve never even flipped someone off in traffic, I’ve been told I have the patience of a saint.

      But surveillance capitalism and stupid paranoid suburbanites satisfying their nosy-neighbor compulsions is definitely a line.

      We’ve got those stupid towers all over the place here too. Construction sites, parking lots.

      Freaking absurd. I’m upset that it’s the best crime deterrent they can come up with, because I suppose skulky fellows lurking around dark parking lots aren’t preferable either.

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 days ago

    The first time I saw one of these was at a Fourth of July gathering in a public park. I saw the high blue lights and I figured it was marking some kind of portable police resource center. I had imagined some basic first aid and some officers ready for emergency assistance. I had imagined something that was partly a service and partly community outreach. I had imagined something with positive features.

    I was so disappointed to find out it was just cameras. Quite an emotional trip in my head there, from “We’re here to help!” to “We’re watching you, fuckers” in the space of a moment.

    But I guess the cops in my suburb are no better than the cops in any other suburb.

  • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 days ago

    Hate it. It’s so annoying. The stores in the area hate it because it pisses people off and they complain to the stores and them the stores are like we hate them as well but the cops put them there.

    • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      I once had the lovely privilege of listening to a police higher up (lieutenant or something?) happily crow about setting these things up. I was just trying not to scoff as he said it was super effective, and yet his little slideshow showed absolutely diddly squat in any changes in the metrics they were using.

      • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        They’re more annoying than the guy who use to setup a speaker and and do busking in the parking lot. At least he provided some kind of service and not…that.

    • Sunflier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      the stores are like we hate them as well but the cops put them there.

      If they’re on a store’s parkinglot, they’re trespassing if they’re there without the store’s consent. That means they can be removed.

        • Sunflier@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 days ago

          Even if they are tenants to a lease, the doctrine of quiet enjoyment would prohibit a landlord from being able to freely agree to having police property sitting on the store’s parking lot if their lease covers the parking lot. It’s kinda like renting a house with a yard: your lease is for the house and the yard surrounding the house. A landlord cannot just come on top the lawn and start ripping it up without the tenant’s permission.

          • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            A landlord cannot just come on top the lawn and start ripping it up without the tenant’s permission.

            On one hand, yes. On the other hand that’s only as enforceable as a tenant can fight it.

            In practice it happens. Unless the tenant has the resources or there’s a legal advocacy group dedicated to that specific issue, owners tend to be able to do whatever they want so long as they use the argument of ‘protecting my property’.

            The settlement and restitution just ends up something like the owner keeps their stuff there and maybe you get to terminate your lease tomorrow without being forced to pay out the whole eight remaining months of the lease. But that’s anecdotal.

            • Sunflier@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              On one hand, yes. On the other hand that’s only as enforceable as a tenant can fight it.

              Trespass to land is a tort, which means there’s the potential for monetary damages.

          • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Regardless it’s the people working at the store who don’t like it. The owner class loves this shit and hate poor people.

      • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m assuming the higher ups for one of the more corp stores allows them there. The people actually working the stores hate them.

        • Sunflier@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I guess that kinda depends on the business structure. Are they fully owned and operated by the main corporation? Or are they licensees of the store’s name and brand? If it’s the first one, some humdrum middle manager could do what you said. If it’s the later, those surveillance things could be trespassing.

          • RebekahWSD@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Each store has to take care of a part of the lot, but this is all secondhand info from employees working in the stores. So I’d assume one of the stores is fine with the yapping tower thing on one of their spots, even if the other stores aren’t.

    • nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah we’ve got a bunch of these in our neighborhood. It’s a rundown area but this just makes it worse. I’d love nothing more than to mask up and smash this shit

      • Fluke@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 days ago

        *Mask up and disassemble that shit for parts on the spot. Make it serve the people, rather than spy on them.

    • All Ice In Chains@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Mobile surveillance stations. Typically solar powered with a backup battery, and the inevitably monstrous result of surveillance capitalism.

  • huppakee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    No worries, a few years of surveillance state and everybody becomes a crackhead one way or the other!

  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    They aren’t common in the places I typically shop, at least not yet.

    So, around here, when you see these, you know you’re in an unsafe part of town, so they’re essentially a huge advertisement to go shop some place safer and nicer. The privacy invasion aspect of it isn’t even really the biggest factor in regards to where I spend my money.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m not saying anyone should do it but in the photo it appears there’s a drainage ditch nearby. It would be real shame if someone with a ski mask and a plateless truck were to relocate it there.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Crackheads? Looks like it was designed by methheads.

    My first reaction was, damn, is that from that episode of Top Gear where they made the stupidest RVs imaginable? What janky nonsense is this, I wondered before reading the comments.